Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Finite-time quantum Otto engine: Surpassing the quasi-static efficiency due to friction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.03622 v3 pith:KU47BJBG submitted 2019-11-09 cond-mat.stat-mech quant-ph

classification cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
keywords enginefrictionquantumagarwalfinite-timefluidlindbladianotto
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In finite-time quantum heat engines, some work is consumed to drive a working fluid accompanying coherence, which is called `friction'. To understand the role of friction in quantum thermodynamics, we present a couple of finite-time quantum Otto cycles with two different baths: Agarwal versus Lindbladian. We solve them exactly and compare the performance of the Agarwal engine with that of the Lindbladian engine. In particular, we find remarkable and counterintuitive results that the performance of the Agarwal engine due to friction can be much higher than that in the quasistatic limit with the Otto efficiency, and the power of the Lindbladian engine can be nonzero in the short-time limit. Based on additional numerical calculations of these outcomes, we discuss possible origins of such differences between two engines and reveal them. Our results imply that even with an equilibrium bath, a nonequilibrium working fluid brings on the higher performance than what an equilibrium working fluid does.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools