Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Self-supervised representation learning from electroencephalography signals

Machine Learning · Submitted 13 Nov 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim As demonstrated on a clinically relevant task (sleep scoring) and with two electroencephalography datasets, our approach outperforms a purely supervised approach in low data regimes, while capturing important physiological information without any access to labels.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1911.05419 (version 1)
Pith IDIQJUEVOB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAapo Hyv\"arinen, Alexandre Gramfort, Denis-Alexander Engemann, Graeme Moffat, Hubert Banville, Isabela Albuquerque. "Self-supervised representation learning from electroencephalography signals." arXiv:1911.05419 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/IQJUEVOB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,333 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.79 · controlled comparison 0.87 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.93 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The supervised learning paradigm is limited by the cost - and sometimes the impracticality - of data collection and labeling in multiple domains. Self-supervised learning, a paradigm which exploits the structure of unlabeled data to create learning problems that can be solved with standard supervised approaches, has shown great promise as a pretraining or feature learning approach in fields like computer vision and time series processing. In this work, we present self-supervision strategies that can be used to learn informative representations from multivariate time series. One successful approach relies on predicting whether time windows are sampled from the same temporal context or not. As demonstrated on a clinically relevant task (sleep scoring) and with two electroencephalography datasets, our approach outperforms a purely supervised approach in low data regimes, while capturing important physiological information without any access to labels.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The supervised learning paradigm is limited by the cost - and sometimes the impracticality - of data collection and labeling in multiple domains. background 0.97 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Self-supervised learning, a paradigm which exploits the structure of unlabeled data to create learning problems that can be solved with standard supervised approaches, has shown great promise as a pretraining or feature learning approach in fields like computer vision and time series processing. background 1.00 0.05 0.04 asserted 0.98
s2 In this work, we present self-supervision strategies that can be used to learn informative representations from multivariate time series. contribution 1.00 0.86 0.07 asserted 0.77
s3 One successful approach relies on predicting whether time windows are sampled from the same temporal context or not. method 0.64 0.12 0.04 asserted 0.98
s4 As demonstrated on a clinically relevant task (sleep scoring) and with two electroencephalography datasets, our approach outperforms a purely supervised approach in low data regimes, while capturing important physiological information without any access to labels. result 1.00 0.96 0.91 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.99 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.55.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The supervised learning paradigm is limited by the cost - and sometimes the impracticality - of data collection and labeling in multiple domains. Self-supervised learning, a paradigm which exploits the structure of unlabeled data to create learning problems that can be solved with standard supervised approaches, has shown great promise as a pretraining or feature learning approach in fields like computer vision and time series processing. In this work, we present self-supervision strategies that can be used to learn informative representations from multivariate time series. One successful approach relies on predicting whether time windows are sampled from the same temporal context or not. As demonstrated on a clinically relevant task (sleep scoring) and with two electroencephalography datasets, our approach outperforms a purely supervised approach in low data regimes, while capturing important physiological information without any access to labels.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.