Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Quantifying the unextendibility of entanglement

Quantum Physics · Submitted 18 Nov 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We further show that the unextendible entanglement provides efficiently computable benchmarks for the rate of exact entanglement or secret key distillation, as well as the overhead of probabilistic entanglement or secret key distillation.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1911.07433 (version 3)
Pith IDZNVHYWMY, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationKun Wang, Mark M. Wilde, Xin Wang. "Quantifying the unextendibility of entanglement." arXiv:1911.07433 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/ZNVHYWMY
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,663 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.14 · compares with prior results 0.08 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Entanglement is a striking feature of quantum mechanics, and it has a key property called unextendibility. In this paper, we present a framework for quantifying and investigating the unextendibility of general bipartite quantum states. First, we define the unextendible entanglement, a family of entanglement measures based on the concept of a state-dependent set of free states. The intuition behind these measures is that the more entangled a bipartite state is, the less entangled each of its individual systems is with a third party. Second, we demonstrate that the unextendible entanglement is an entanglement monotone under two-extendible quantum operations, including local operations and one-way classical communication as a special case. Normalization and faithfulness are two other desirable properties of unextendible entanglement, which we establish here. We further show that the unextendible entanglement provides efficiently computable benchmarks for the rate of exact entanglement or secret key distillation, as well as the overhead of probabilistic entanglement or secret key distillation.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Entanglement is a striking feature of quantum mechanics, and it has a key property called unextendibility. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 In this paper, we present a framework for quantifying and investigating the unextendibility of general bipartite quantum states. contribution 1.00 0.91 0.08 asserted 0.96
s2 First, we define the unextendible entanglement, a family of entanglement measures based on the concept of a state-dependent set of free states. contribution 0.84 0.95 0.09 asserted 1.00
s3 The intuition behind these measures is that the more entangled a bipartite state is, the less entangled each of its individual systems is with a third party. interpretation 0.94 0.19 0.06 asserted 0.96
s4 Second, we demonstrate that the unextendible entanglement is an entanglement monotone under two-extendible quantum operations, including local operations and one-way classical communication as a special case. result 0.92 0.96 0.17 asserted 1.00
s5 Normalization and faithfulness are two other desirable properties of unextendible entanglement, which we establish here. result 0.69 0.94 0.07 asserted 1.00
s6 We further show that the unextendible entanglement provides efficiently computable benchmarks for the rate of exact entanglement or secret key distillation, as well as the overhead of probabilistic entanglement or secret key distillation. result 0.85 0.95 0.33 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.54 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Entanglement is a striking feature of quantum mechanics, and it has a key property called unextendibility. In this paper, we present a framework for quantifying and investigating the unextendibility of general bipartite quantum states. First, we define the unextendible entanglement, a family of entanglement measures based on the concept of a state-dependent set of free states. The intuition behind these measures is that the more entangled a bipartite state is, the less entangled each of its individual systems is with a third party. Second, we demonstrate that the unextendible entanglement is an entanglement monotone under two-extendible quantum operations, including local operations and one-way classical communication as a special case. Normalization and faithfulness are two other desirable properties of unextendible entanglement, which we establish here. We further show that the unextendible entanglement provides efficiently computable benchmarks for the rate of exact entanglement or secret key distillation, as well as the overhead of probabilistic entanglement or secret key distillation.

Human review
How the literature uses it

13 arXiv papers cite this in 40 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 30 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Cites it as background 6 papers

What it cites · 3 sentences without a confident label

Uses data or values from 1 paper
  • Note that the relative entropy of entanglement for qubit-qubit isotropic states ($d=2$) was calculated in [ref] .

    Quantifying Entanglement · Examples · 0.84

Cites as background 4 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.