Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Verifiable Hybrid Secret Sharing With Few Qubits

Quantum Physics · Submitted 21 Nov 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We propose a protocol that achieves this task, while reducing the number of required qubits, as compared to the existing protocols.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1911.09470 (version 2)
Pith IDIEJA2OWN, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGl\'aucia Murta, J\'er\'emy Ribeiro, Stephanie Wehner, Victoria Lipinska. "Verifiable Hybrid Secret Sharing With Few Qubits." arXiv:1911.09470 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/IEJA2OWN
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,836 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.40 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.30 · randomized assignment 0.03 · states quantitative result 0.96 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider the task of sharing a secret quantum state in a quantum network in a verifiable way. We propose a protocol that achieves this task, while reducing the number of required qubits, as compared to the existing protocols. To achieve this, we combine classical encryption of the quantum secret with an existing verifiable quantum secret sharing scheme based on Calderbank-Shor-Steane quantum error correcting codes. In this way we obtain a verifiable hybrid secret sharing scheme for sharing qubits, which combines the benefits of quantum and classical schemes. Our scheme does not reveal any information to any group of less than half of the $n$ nodes participating in the protocol. Moreover, for sharing a one-qubit state each node needs a quantum memory to store $n$ single-qubit shares, and requires a workspace of at most $3n$ qubits in total to verify the quantum secret. Importantly, in our scheme an individual share is encoded in a single qubit, as opposed to previous schemes requiring $\Omega(\log n)$ qubits per share. Furthermore, we define a ramp verifiable hybrid scheme. We give explicit examples of various verifiable hybrid schemes based on existing quantum error correcting codes.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider the task of sharing a secret quantum state in a quantum network in a verifiable way. background 0.99 0.22 0.06 unclear 0.50
s1 We propose a protocol that achieves this task, while reducing the number of required qubits, as compared to the existing protocols. contribution 0.99 0.92 0.50 asserted 0.99
s2 To achieve this, we combine classical encryption of the quantum secret with an existing verifiable quantum secret sharing scheme based on Calderbank-Shor-Steane quantum error correcting codes. method 0.98 0.80 0.08 asserted 1.00
s3 In this way we obtain a verifiable hybrid secret sharing scheme for sharing qubits, which combines the benefits of quantum and classical schemes. contribution 0.63 0.88 0.25 asserted 1.00
s4 Our scheme does not reveal any information to any group of less than half of the $n$ nodes participating in the protocol. result 0.96 0.87 0.16 asserted 1.00
s5 Moreover, for sharing a one-qubit state each node needs a quantum memory to store $n$ single-qubit shares, and requires a workspace of at most $3n$ qubits in total to verify the quantum secret. result 0.90 0.90 0.15 asserted 1.00
s6 Importantly, in our scheme an individual share is encoded in a single qubit, as opposed to previous schemes requiring $\Omega(\log n)$ qubits per share. result 0.54 0.85 0.23 asserted 1.00
s7 Furthermore, we define a ramp verifiable hybrid scheme. contribution 1.00 0.93 0.05 asserted 0.99
s8 We give explicit examples of various verifiable hybrid schemes based on existing quantum error correcting codes. contribution 0.99 0.91 0.07 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.86.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider the task of sharing a secret quantum state in a quantum network in a verifiable way. We propose a protocol that achieves this task, while reducing the number of required qubits, as compared to the existing protocols. To achieve this, we combine classical encryption of the quantum secret with an existing verifiable quantum secret sharing scheme based on Calderbank-Shor-Steane quantum error correcting codes. In this way we obtain a verifiable hybrid secret sharing scheme for sharing qubits, which combines the benefits of quantum and classical schemes. Our scheme does not reveal any information to any group of less than half of the $n$ nodes participating in the protocol. Moreover, for sharing a one-qubit state each node needs a quantum memory to store $n$ single-qubit shares, and requires a workspace of at most $3n$ qubits in total to verify the quantum secret. Importantly, in our scheme an individual share is encoded in a single qubit, as opposed to previous schemes requiring $\Omega(\log n)$ qubits per share. Furthermore, we define a ramp verifiable hybrid scheme. We give explicit examples of various verifiable hybrid schemes based on existing quantum error correcting codes.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 13 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • This way nodes create logical $Ψ_i$ encoded twice with $$, see Figure [ref]. * The nodes publicly create sets $B_i,ℓ$ containing all second-level errors from all $n$ executions of sequential VQSS (see [ref] for details).

    Secure multi-party quantum computation with few qubits · Multi-party quantum computation · 0.93

What it cites · 8 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 1 paper
  • In order to evaluate probability of aborting, we will follow the solution suggested in [ref] for the parallel execution of the and we will show how to use this result for the sequential setting.

    Multi-party Quantum Computation · Security of the scheme CITEMARK77Z in the sequential setting · 0.91

Uses the method or tool of 3 papers
  • We adapt the verification procedure from the work of [ref] to run in a sequential way.

    Multi-party Quantum Computation · Verifiable Quantum Secret Sharing · 0.83

  • For the construction we use higher-distance quantum error correcting codes, for example toric codes and color codes [ref] , and scheme of [ref] .

    Fault-tolerant quantum computing with color codes · Resource reduction · 0.96

  • For the construction we use higher-distance quantum error correcting codes, for example toric codes and color codes [ref] , and scheme of [ref] .

    Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary · Resource reduction · 0.96

Compares with 1 paper
  • In comparison, in [ref] all of the above steps are performed in parallel, and effectively, each node needs to control $Ω(r^2nlog(n))$ at once.

    Multi-party Quantum Computation · Verifiable Quantum Secret Sharing · 1.00

Cites as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.