Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Distributional Invariances and Interventional Markov Equivalence for Mixed Graph Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.10114 v2 pith:QENLIPUZ submitted 2019-11-22 math.ST math.COstat.TH

Distributional Invariances and Interventional Markov Equivalence for Mixed Graph Models

classification math.ST math.COstat.TH
keywords interventionalmodelsequivalencemarkovmecsmixedgraphicalobservational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The invariance properties of interventional distributions relative to the observational distribution, and how these properties allow us to refine Markov equivalence classes (MECs) of DAGs, is central to causal DAG discovery algorithms that use both interventional and observational data. Here, we show how the invariance properties of interventional DAG models, and the corresponding refinement of MECs into interventional MECs, can be generalized to mixed graphical models that allow for latent cofounders and selection variables. We first generalize interventional Markov equivalence to all formal independence models associated to loopless mixed graphs. For ancestral graphs, we prove the resulting interventional MECs admit a graphical characterization generalizing that of DAGs. We then define interventional distributions for acyclic directed mixed graph models, and prove that this generalization aligns with the graphical generalization of interventional Markov equivalence given for the formal independence models. This provides a framework for causal model discovery via observational and interventional data in the presence of latent confounders that applies even when the interventions are uncontrolled.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.