REVIEW 2 cited by
Why are Adaptive Methods Good for Attention Models?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is still the \emph{de facto} algorithm in deep learning, adaptive methods like Clipped SGD/Adam have been observed to outperform SGD across important tasks, such as attention models. The settings under which SGD performs poorly in comparison to adaptive methods are not well understood yet. In this paper, we provide empirical and theoretical evidence that a heavy-tailed distribution of the noise in stochastic gradients is one cause of SGD's poor performance. We provide the first tight upper and lower convergence bounds for adaptive gradient methods under heavy-tailed noise. Further, we demonstrate how gradient clipping plays a key role in addressing heavy-tailed gradient noise. Subsequently, we show how clipping can be applied in practice by developing an \emph{adaptive} coordinate-wise clipping algorithm (ACClip) and demonstrate its superior performance on BERT pretraining and finetuning tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On the Performance of Differentially Private Optimization with Heavy-Tail Class Imbalance
Under heavy-tail class imbalance, subtracting the DP noise variance from Adam's second moment (DP-AdamBC) substantially improves learning of rare classes compared with DP gradient descent.
-
Perspectives on Tsallis Statistics for Artificial Intelligence
Independent AI methods, including sparsemax attention, Tsallis-entropy reinforcement learning, Student-t generative models, and robust losses, are instances of a single 'q-dial' deformation of Boltzmann-Gibbs statisti...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.