Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ReluDiff: Differential Verification of Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.03662 v2 pith:PENQNR5Y submitted 2020-01-10 cs.LG cs.LOcs.SEstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.LOcs.SEstat.ML
keywords networkspassverificationmethodnetworkaccuratelybackwarddeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As deep neural networks are increasingly being deployed in practice, their efficiency has become an important issue. While there are compression techniques for reducing the network's size, energy consumption and computational requirement, they only demonstrate empirically that there is no loss of accuracy, but lack formal guarantees of the compressed network, e.g., in the presence of adversarial examples. Existing verification techniques such as Reluplex, ReluVal, and DeepPoly provide formal guarantees, but they are designed for analyzing a single network instead of the relationship between two networks. To fill the gap, we develop a new method for differential verification of two closely related networks. Our method consists of a fast but approximate forward interval analysis pass followed by a backward pass that iteratively refines the approximation until the desired property is verified. We have two main innovations. During the forward pass, we exploit structural and behavioral similarities of the two networks to more accurately bound the difference between the output neurons of the two networks. Then in the backward pass, we leverage the gradient differences to more accurately compute the most beneficial refinement. Our experiments show that, compared to state-of-the-art verification tools, our method can achieve orders-of-magnitude speedup and prove many more properties than existing tools.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Of Good Demons and Bad Angels: Guaranteeing Safe Control under Finite Precision

    eess.SY 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A dL/dGL-based method that verifies infinite-horizon safety of neural network controllers under bounded finite-precision perturbations and synthesizes sound mixed-precision fixed-point implementations.

Pith tools