Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On Last-Layer Algorithms for Classification: Decoupling Representation from Uncertainty Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.08049 v1 pith:7P7OHDZB submitted 2020-01-22 stat.ML cs.LG

On Last-Layer Algorithms for Classification: Decoupling Representation from Uncertainty Estimation

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords uncertaintyclassificationestimationalgorithmsdeepensemblegradientlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Uncertainty quantification for deep learning is a challenging open problem. Bayesian statistics offer a mathematically grounded framework to reason about uncertainties; however, approximate posteriors for modern neural networks still require prohibitive computational costs. We propose a family of algorithms which split the classification task into two stages: representation learning and uncertainty estimation. We compare four specific instances, where uncertainty estimation is performed via either an ensemble of Stochastic Gradient Descent or Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics snapshots, an ensemble of bootstrapped logistic regressions, or via a number of Monte Carlo Dropout passes. We evaluate their performance in terms of \emph{selective} classification (risk-coverage), and their ability to detect out-of-distribution samples. Our experiments suggest there is limited value in adding multiple uncertainty layers to deep classifiers, and we observe that these simple methods strongly outperform a vanilla point-estimate SGD in some complex benchmarks like ImageNet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uncertainty quantification for trustworthy deep learning: Methods and measures

    stat.ML 2026-07 accept novelty 3.0

    A structured survey separates UQ methods from uncertainty measures, rates ensemble and single-pass families on cost and quality, and flags open gaps in efficient epistemic scoring and last-layer diversity.