Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Model-assisted cohort selection with bias analysis for generating large-scale cohorts from the EHR for oncology research

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.09765 v1 pith:44MRCLGH submitted 2020-01-13 cs.CY cs.LG

classification cs.CYcs.LG
keywords cohortbiasanalysispatientsselectionmacsresearchdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Objective Electronic health records (EHRs) are a promising source of data for health outcomes research in oncology. A challenge in using EHR data is that selecting cohorts of patients often requires information in unstructured parts of the record. Machine learning has been used to address this, but even high-performing algorithms may select patients in a non-random manner and bias the resulting cohort. To improve the efficiency of cohort selection while measuring potential bias, we introduce a technique called Model-Assisted Cohort Selection (MACS) with Bias Analysis and apply it to the selection of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients. Materials and Methods We trained a model on 17,263 patients using term-frequency inverse-document-frequency (TF-IDF) and logistic regression. We used a test set of 17,292 patients to measure algorithm performance and perform Bias Analysis. We compared the cohort generated by MACS to the cohort that would have been generated without MACS as reference standard, first by comparing distributions of an extensive set of clinical and demographic variables and then by comparing the results of two analyses addressing existing example research questions. Results Our algorithm had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.976, a sensitivity of 96.0%, and an abstraction efficiency gain of 77.9%. During Bias Analysis, we found no large differences in baseline characteristics and no differences in the example analyses. Conclusion MACS with bias analysis can significantly improve the efficiency of cohort selection on EHR data while instilling confidence that outcomes research performed on the resulting cohort will not be biased.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Doubly Robust Fusion of Many Treatments for Policy Learning

    stat.ME 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A calibration-weighted, fused-lasso treatment fusion procedure recovers latent treatment groups with double robustness and improves multi-armed policy learning.

  2. Modeling therapy sequence for advanced cancer: A microsimulation approach leveraging Electronic Health Record data

    q-bio.QM 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An observed-trajectory microsimulation method using EHR data usually outperforms a multi-state-model method and a Markov cohort model for estimating cost-effectiveness of cancer therapy sequences.

Pith tools