REVIEW 1 cited by
Entropy Minimization vs. Diversity Maximization for Domain Adaptation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Entropy minimization has been widely used in unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA). However, existing works reveal that entropy minimization only may result into collapsed trivial solutions. In this paper, we propose to avoid trivial solutions by further introducing diversity maximization. In order to achieve the possible minimum target risk for UDA, we show that diversity maximization should be elaborately balanced with entropy minimization, the degree of which can be finely controlled with the use of deep embedded validation in an unsupervised manner. The proposed minimal-entropy diversity maximization (MEDM) can be directly implemented by stochastic gradient descent without use of adversarial learning. Empirical evidence demonstrates that MEDM outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on four popular domain adaptation datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Proto-EVFL: Enhanced Vertical Federated Learning via Dual Prototype with Extremely Unaligned Data
Proto-EVFL selects useful unaligned data in vertical federated learning with a dual optimal transport cost and class priors, then aggregates party features with learned gates, improving accuracy on rare and unseen classes.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.