REVIEW 2 cited by
Reward-rational (implicit) choice: A unifying formalism for reward learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
It is often difficult to hand-specify what the correct reward function is for a task, so researchers have instead aimed to learn reward functions from human behavior or feedback. The types of behavior interpreted as evidence of the reward function have expanded greatly in recent years. We've gone from demonstrations, to comparisons, to reading into the information leaked when the human is pushing the robot away or turning it off. And surely, there is more to come. How will a robot make sense of all these diverse types of behavior? Our key insight is that different types of behavior can be interpreted in a single unifying formalism - as a reward-rational choice that the human is making, often implicitly. The formalism offers both a unifying lens with which to view past work, as well as a recipe for interpreting new sources of information that are yet to be uncovered. We provide two examples to showcase this: interpreting a new feedback type, and reading into how the choice of feedback itself leaks information about the reward.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MAVRL: Learning Reward Functions from Multiple Feedback Types with Amortized Variational Inference
MAVRL trains one reward model from demonstrations, comparisons, ratings, and stops using a single evidence lower bound, and shows in simulation that combining types improves reward recovery and robustness.
-
Mapping out the Space of Human Feedback for Reinforcement Learning: A Conceptual Framework
A conceptual framework classifies human feedback to RL agents along nine dimensions and seven quality criteria, unifying human-centered, interface-centered, and model-centered design perspectives.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.