REVIEW 3 cited by
Efficient Adaptive Experimental Design for Average Treatment Effect Estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study how to efficiently estimate average treatment effects (ATEs) using adaptive experiments. In adaptive experiments, experimenters sequentially assign treatments to experimental units while updating treatment assignment probabilities based on past data. We start by defining the efficient treatment-assignment probability, which minimizes the semiparametric efficiency bound for ATE estimation. Our proposed experimental design estimates and uses the efficient treatment-assignment probability to assign treatments. At the end of the proposed design, the experimenter estimates the ATE using a newly proposed Adaptive Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (A2IPW) estimator. We show that the asymptotic variance of the A2IPW estimator using data from the proposed design achieves the minimized semiparametric efficiency bound. We also analyze the estimator's finite-sample properties and develop nonparametric and nonasymptotic confidence intervals that are valid at any round of the proposed design. These anytime valid confidence intervals allow us to conduct rate-optimal sequential hypothesis testing, allowing for early stopping and reducing necessary sample size.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Confidence Horizons
A new family of 'asymptotic confidence horizons' provides large-sample anytime-valid coverage on bounded time windows, with closed-form boundary quantiles and connections to group sequential methods.
-
Minimax and Bayes Optimal Best-Arm Identification
TS-SPAS attains the exact asymptotic minimax and Bayes constants for fixed-budget best-arm identification, with matching lower and upper bounds over exponential family outcomes.
-
Adaptive Experimental Design Using Shrinkage Estimators
Adaptive trials that allocate patients by minimizing the estimated risk of a shrinkage estimator reduce estimation error in simulations, especially at low signal-to-noise, compared with Neyman allocation.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.