REVIEW 1 cited by
Sharp Asymptotics and Optimal Performance for Inference in Binary Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We study convex empirical risk minimization for high-dimensional inference in binary models. Our first result sharply predicts the statistical performance of such estimators in the linear asymptotic regime under isotropic Gaussian features. Importantly, the predictions hold for a wide class of convex loss functions, which we exploit in order to prove a bound on the best achievable performance among them. Notably, we show that the proposed bound is tight for popular binary models (such as Signed, Logistic or Probit), by constructing appropriate loss functions that achieve it. More interestingly, for binary linear classification under the Logistic and Probit models, we prove that the performance of least-squares is no worse than 0.997 and 0.98 times the optimal one. Numerical simulations corroborate our theoretical findings and suggest they are accurate even for relatively small problem dimensions.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Thumb on the Scale: Optimal Loss Weighting in Last Layer Retraining
For square-loss weighted ERM in the proportional asymptotic regime, the class weight that equalizes per-class errors is ρ̃ = π−/π+ + (π−/π+ − 1) δ/(2π+ − δ), exceeding the ratio of priors and growing with δ.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.