Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Kraken reveals itself -- the merger history of the Milky Way reconstructed with the E-MOSAICS simulations

Astrophysics of Galaxies · Submitted 2 Mar 2020

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We conclude by organising these accretion events into the most detailed reconstruction to date of the Milky Way's merger tree.

how it is stated · asserted 0.97 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2003.01119 (version 1)
Pith IDKYOKHLRH, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
Citation(2) LJMU, (3) Harvard), Ana Bonaca (3), J. M. Diederik Kruijssen (1), Joel L. Pfeffer (2), Marta Reina-Campos (1), Meghan Hughes (2) ((1) Heidelberg, M\'elanie Chevance (1), Nate Bastian (2), Rob Crain (2), Sebastian Trujillo-Gomez (1). "Kraken reveals itself -- the merger history of the Milky Way reconstructed with the E-MOSAICS simulations." arXiv:2003.01119 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/KYOKHLRH
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,723 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.18 · states limitation 0.48 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.22 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Globular clusters (GCs) formed when the Milky Way experienced a phase of rapid assembly. We use the wealth of information contained in the Galactic GC population to quantify the properties of the satellite galaxies from which the Milky Way assembled. To achieve this, we train an artificial neural network on the E-MOSAICS cosmological simulations of the co-formation and co-evolution of GCs and their host galaxies. The network uses the ages, metallicities, and orbital properties of GCs that formed in the same progenitor galaxies to predict the stellar masses and accretion redshifts of these progenitors. We apply the network to Galactic GCs associated with five progenitors: {\it Gaia}-Enceladus, the Helmi streams, Sequoia, Sagittarius, and the recently discovered, `low-energy' GCs, which provide an excellent match to the predicted properties of the enigmatic galaxy `Kraken'. The five galaxies cover a narrow stellar mass range [$M_\star=(0.6{-}4.6)\times10^8~{\rm M}_\odot$], but have widely different accretion redshifts ($z_{\rm acc}=0.57{-}2.65$). All accretion events represent minor mergers, but Kraken likely represents the most major merger ever experienced by the Milky Way, with stellar and virial mass ratios of $r_{M_\star}=1$:$31^{+34}_{-16}$ and $r_{M_{\rm h}}=1$:$7^{+4}_{-2}$, respectively. The progenitors match the $z=0$ relation between GC number and halo virial mass, but have elevated specific frequencies, suggesting an evolution with redshift. Even though these progenitors likely were the Milky Way's most massive accretion events, they contributed a total mass of only $\log{(M_{\rm \star,tot}/{\rm M}_\odot)}=9.0\pm0.1$, similar to the stellar halo. This implies that the Milky Way grew its stellar mass mostly by in-situ star formation. We conclude by organising these accretion events into the most detailed reconstruction to date of the Milky Way's merger tree.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Globular clusters (GCs) formed when the Milky Way experienced a phase of rapid assembly. background 0.99 0.13 0.04 asserted 1.00
s1 We use the wealth of information contained in the Galactic GC population to quantify the properties of the satellite galaxies from which the Milky Way assembled. contribution 0.94 0.61 0.03 asserted 0.96
s2 To achieve this, we train an artificial neural network on the E-MOSAICS cosmological simulations of the co-formation and co-evolution of GCs and their host galaxies. method 1.00 0.93 0.02 asserted 0.98
s3 The network uses the ages, metallicities, and orbital properties of GCs that formed in the same progenitor galaxies to predict the stellar masses and accretion redshifts of these progenitors. method 1.00 0.80 0.03 asserted 1.00
s4 We apply the network to Galactic GCs associated with five progenitors: {\it Gaia}-Enceladus, the Helmi streams, Sequoia, Sagittarius, and the recently discovered, `low-energy' GCs, which provide an excellent match to the predicted properties of the enigmatic galaxy `Kraken'. result 0.77 0.89 0.15 asserted 0.95
s5 The five galaxies cover a narrow stellar mass range [$M_\star=(0.6{-}4.6)\times10^8~{\rm M}_\odot$], but have widely different accretion redshifts ($z_{\rm acc}=0.57{-}2.65$). result 1.00 0.89 0.05 asserted 1.00
s6 All accretion events represent minor mergers, but Kraken likely represents the most major merger ever experienced by the Milky Way, with stellar and virial mass ratios of $r_{M_\star}=1$:$31^{+34}_{-16}$ and $r_{M_{\rm h}}=1$:$7^{+4}_{-2}$, respectively. result 0.88 0.89 0.30 hedged possibility 0.95
s7 The progenitors match the $z=0$ relation between GC number and halo virial mass, but have elevated specific frequencies, suggesting an evolution with redshift. result 0.91 0.86 0.06 hedged possibility 0.73
s8 Even though these progenitors likely were the Milky Way's most massive accretion events, they contributed a total mass of only $\log{(M_{\rm \star,tot}/{\rm M}_\odot)}=9.0\pm0.1$, similar to the stellar halo. result 0.98 0.90 0.12 asserted 0.65
s9 This implies that the Milky Way grew its stellar mass mostly by in-situ star formation. interpretation 1.00 0.79 0.24 asserted 0.86
s10 We conclude by organising these accretion events into the most detailed reconstruction to date of the Milky Way's merger tree. contribution 0.97 0.93 0.28 asserted 0.97

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.70 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.79.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Globular clusters (GCs) formed when the Milky Way experienced a phase of rapid assembly. We use the wealth of information contained in the Galactic GC population to quantify the properties of the satellite galaxies from which the Milky Way assembled. To achieve this, we train an artificial neural network on the E-MOSAICS cosmological simulations of the co-formation and co-evolution of GCs and their host galaxies. The network uses the ages, metallicities, and orbital properties of GCs that formed in the same progenitor galaxies to predict the stellar masses and accretion redshifts of these progenitors. We apply the network to Galactic GCs associated with five progenitors: {\it Gaia}-Enceladus, the Helmi streams, Sequoia, Sagittarius, and the recently discovered, `low-energy' GCs, which provide an excellent match to the predicted properties of the enigmatic galaxy `Kraken'. The five galaxies cover a narrow stellar mass range [$M_\star=(0.6{-}4.6)\times10^8~{\rm M}_\odot$], but have widely different accretion redshifts ($z_{\rm acc}=0.57{-}2.65$). All accretion events represent minor mergers, but Kraken likely represents the most major merger ever experienced by the Milky Way, with stellar and virial mass ratios of $r_{M_\star}=1$:$31^{+34}_{-16}$ and $r_{M_{\rm h}}=1$:$7^{+4}_{-2}$, respectively. The progenitors match the $z=0$ relation between GC number and halo virial mass, but have elevated specific frequencies, suggesting an evolution with redshift. Even though these progenitors likely were the Milky Way's most massive accretion events, they contributed a total mass of only $\log{(M_{\rm \star,tot}/{\rm M}_\odot)}=9.0\pm0.1$, similar to the stellar halo. This implies that the Milky Way grew its stellar mass mostly by in-situ star formation. We conclude by organising these accretion events into the most detailed reconstruction to date of the Milky Way's merger tree.

Human review
References
How later papers used it

151 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 116 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 21 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 17 of the 297 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Uses its data or values 3 of 16 papers with this label · 2 by the same authors

By the same authors

How the literature uses it

35 arXiv papers cite this in 84 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 61 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 3 papers
Compares with it 5 papers
Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 4 papers

What it cites · 33 sentences without a confident label

Uses data or values from 1 paper
Compares with 2 papers
  • [ref] estimate that was accreted $∼10$ ago, whereas [ref] estimate a range of $8-11$ ago, and [ref] provide an upper limit on the accretion redshift of $<1.5$ (or $<9.5$).

    Co-formation of the Galactic disc and the stellar halo · Accretion redshifts · 0.95

  • The remaining 10 satellites are expected to have masses below $∼10^8$ (or otherwise they would have contributed $5$ GCs, which would plausibly have been identified), implying that the total accreted stellar mass is likely to be close to the sum of the five satellites discussed here (which is on the low side of, but consistent with the predictions for Milky Way-mass galaxies by [ref] and [ref] , who find $1-5×10^9$).

    Empirical constraints on the formation of early-type galaxies · Satellite accretion history and in-situ growth · 0.95

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.