Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quantum Random Access Stored-Program Machines

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.03514 v2 pith:VGQJ5DUI submitted 2020-03-07 cs.LO quant-ph

Quantum Random Access Stored-Program Machines

classification cs.LO quant-ph
keywords machinestextbfaccessquantumrandomqramsrelationshipsstored-program
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Random access machines (RAMs) and random access stored-program machines (RASPs) are models of computing that are closer to the architecture of real-world computers than Turing machines (TMs). They are also convenient in complexity analysis of algorithms. The relationships between RAMs, RASPs and TMs are well-studied. However, clear relationships between their quantum counterparts are still missing in the literature. We fill in this gap by formally defining the models of quantum random access machines (QRAMs) and quantum random access stored-program machines (QRASPs) and clarifying the relationships between QRAMs, QRASPs and quantum Turing machines (QTMs). In particular, we show that $\textbf{P} \subseteq \textbf{EQRAMP} \subseteq \textbf{EQP} \subseteq \textbf{BQP} = \textbf{BQRAMP}$, where $\textbf{EQRAMP}$ and $\textbf{BQRAMP}$ stand for the sets of problems that can be solved by polynomial-time QRAMs with certainty and bounded-error, respectively. At the heart of our proof, is a standardisation of QTM with an extended halting scheme, which is of independent interest.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.