Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Teaching Temporal Logics to Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.04218 v3 pith:5EOSWJBS submitted 2020-03-06 cs.LO cs.AIcs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.LOcs.AIcs.LGstat.ML
keywords solutionslogicsclassicalformulaspredictformulanetworksneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study two fundamental questions in neuro-symbolic computing: can deep learning tackle challenging problems in logics end-to-end, and can neural networks learn the semantics of logics. In this work we focus on linear-time temporal logic (LTL), as it is widely used in verification. We train a Transformer on the problem to directly predict a solution, i.e. a trace, to a given LTL formula. The training data is generated with classical solvers, which, however, only provide one of many possible solutions to each formula. We demonstrate that it is sufficient to train on those particular solutions to formulas, and that Transformers can predict solutions even to formulas from benchmarks from the literature on which the classical solver timed out. Transformers also generalize to the semantics of the logics: while they often deviate from the solutions found by the classical solvers, they still predict correct solutions to most formulas.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LTLZinc: a Benchmarking Framework for Continual Learning and Neuro-Symbolic Temporal Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    LTLZinc generates image-based temporal reasoning and continual learning benchmarks from LTLf formulas over MiniZinc constraints, and experiments show existing methods often fail.

Pith tools