REVIEW 4 cited by
Adv-BERT: BERT is not robust on misspellings! Generating nature adversarial samples on BERT
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Adv-BERT: BERT is not robust on misspellings! Generating nature adversarial samples on BERT
read the original abstract
There is an increasing amount of literature that claims the brittleness of deep neural networks in dealing with adversarial examples that are created maliciously. It is unclear, however, how the models will perform in realistic scenarios where \textit{natural rather than malicious} adversarial instances often exist. This work systematically explores the robustness of BERT, the state-of-the-art Transformer-style model in NLP, in dealing with noisy data, particularly mistakes in typing the keyboard, that occur inadvertently. Intensive experiments on sentiment analysis and question answering benchmarks indicate that: (i) Typos in various words of a sentence do not influence equally. The typos in informative words make severer damages; (ii) Mistype is the most damaging factor, compared with inserting, deleting, etc.; (iii) Humans and machines have different focuses on recognizing adversarial attacks.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Fast Byte Latent Transformer
BLT-D, BLT-S, and BLT-DV use block-wise diffusion training and speculative verification to enable parallel byte generation in byte-level LMs, cutting memory-bandwidth cost by over 50%.
-
How Tokenization Limits Phonological Knowledge Representation in Language Models and How to Improve Them
Subword tokenization impairs phonological knowledge encoding in LMs, but an IPA-based fine-tuning method restores it with minimal impact on other capabilities.
-
Library Hallucinations in LLM-Generated Code: A Risk Analysis Grounded in Developer Queries
A study of seven LLMs finds that realistic prompt variations such as one-character misspellings trigger library hallucinations in up to 26% of cases, fabricated names in up to 99%, and time-based prompts in up to 85%,...
-
LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods
A survey that organizes LLMs-as-judges research into functionality, methodology, applications, meta-evaluation, and limitations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.