Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Communication-Efficient Distributed Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.06307 v2 pith:5BTJUSJ6 submitted 2020-03-10 cs.DC cs.LGeess.SP

Communication-Efficient Distributed Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey

classification cs.DC cs.LGeess.SP
keywords distributedalgorithmscommunicationconvergencetrainingbecomecommunication-efficientcompare
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Distributed deep learning (DL) has become prevalent in recent years to reduce training time by leveraging multiple computing devices (e.g., GPUs/TPUs) due to larger models and datasets. However, system scalability is limited by communication becoming the performance bottleneck. Addressing this communication issue has become a prominent research topic. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey of the communication-efficient distributed training algorithms, focusing on both system-level and algorithmic-level optimizations. We first propose a taxonomy of data-parallel distributed training algorithms that incorporates four primary dimensions: communication synchronization, system architectures, compression techniques, and parallelism of communication and computing tasks. We then investigate state-of-the-art studies that address problems in these four dimensions. We also compare the convergence rates of different algorithms to understand their convergence speed. Additionally, we conduct extensive experiments to empirically compare the convergence performance of various mainstream distributed training algorithms. Based on our system-level communication cost analysis, theoretical and experimental convergence speed comparison, we provide readers with an understanding of which algorithms are more efficient under specific distributed environments. Our research also extrapolates potential directions for further optimizations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Rescaled Asynchronous SGD: Optimal Distributed Optimization under Data and System Heterogeneity

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Rescaled ASGD recovers convergence to the true global objective by rescaling worker stepsizes proportional to computation times, matching the known time lower bound in the leading term under non-convex smoothness and ...

  2. Serving Chain-structured Jobs with Large Memory Footprints with Application to Large Foundation Model Serving

    cs.DC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper defines server chain composition for large-memory jobs as an NP-hard problem and gives scalable algorithms with performance guarantees that reduce response times in foundation model serving.