Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Designing Tools for Semi-Automated Detection of Machine Learning Biases: An Interview Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.07680 v2 pith:LZI3BMEP submitted 2020-03-13 cs.CY cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CYcs.LGstat.ML
keywords biasdetectionlearningmachinetoolssemi-automatedbiasesconsiderations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning models often make predictions that bias against certain subgroups of input data. When undetected, machine learning biases can constitute significant financial and ethical implications. Semi-automated tools that involve humans in the loop could facilitate bias detection. Yet, little is known about the considerations involved in their design. In this paper, we report on an interview study with 11 machine learning practitioners for investigating the needs surrounding semi-automated bias detection tools. Based on the findings, we highlight four considerations in designing to guide system designers who aim to create future tools for bias detection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools