Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A survey of bias in Machine Learning through the prism of Statistical Parity for the Adult Data Set

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.14263 v2 pith:ZX5UK6T4 submitted 2020-03-31 stat.ML cs.CYcs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.CYcs.LG
keywords biaslearningmachineadultbinaryclassificationdatadecisions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Applications based on Machine Learning models have now become an indispensable part of the everyday life and the professional world. A critical question then recently arised among the population: Do algorithmic decisions convey any type of discrimination against specific groups of population or minorities? In this paper, we show the importance of understanding how a bias can be introduced into automatic decisions. We first present a mathematical framework for the fair learning problem, specifically in the binary classification setting. We then propose to quantify the presence of bias by using the standard Disparate Impact index on the real and well-known Adult income data set. Finally, we check the performance of different approaches aiming to reduce the bias in binary classification outcomes. Importantly, we show that some intuitive methods are ineffective. This sheds light on the fact trying to make fair machine learning models may be a particularly challenging task, in particular when the training observations contain a bias.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tackling Algorithmic Bias in Neural-Network Classifiers using Wasserstein-2 Regularization

    stat.ML 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A method to reduce algorithmic bias in neural-network classifiers by regularizing with the Wasserstein-2 distance between score distributions of two groups, with approximate gradients that fit into SGD.

Pith tools