pith. sign in

arxiv: 2004.13043 · v2 · submitted 2020-04-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.str-el· cond-mat.supr-con

Color degeneracy of competing orders near topological defects cores in planar quadratic band touching systems

Bitan Roy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 15:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords quadratic band touchingvortex corecompeting orderscolor degeneracybilayer grapheneSO(5) algebrachiral symmetrytopological defects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Near vortex cores in quadratic band touching systems, ten additional masses close an SO(5) algebra and create color degeneracy by lifting chiral symmetries in multiple ways.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines two-dimensional fermionic systems with quadratic band touching in the normal state when vortices and skyrmions of insulating and superconducting masses are present. A prototypical case is Bernal bilayer graphene, which binds eight zero-energy modes to a mass vortex possessing the right U(1) symmetry. These modes can be split by ten extra mass terms forming an SO(5) algebra that lifts the SO(4) symmetry in five ways and each of two SU(2) chiral symmetries in three distinct ways. The resulting multiplicity produces color degeneracy among competing chiral-triplet orders near the core. Skyrmions of three anticommuting masses instead support six additional masses plus an SU(2) isospin quantum number, permitting specific pair-density waves or pairings inside the core.

Core claim

Near the vortex core, additional ten masses that close an SO(5) algebra can develop local expectation values by splitting the manifold of zero modes in five and ten different ways by lifting its SO(4) and SU(2) chiral symmetries, respectively. In particular, each SU(2) chiral symmetry can be broken by three distinct copies of chiral-triplet mass orders, giving rise to the notion of the color degeneracy among the competing orders near the vortex core.

What carries the argument

The manifold of eight zero-energy modes around a mass vortex with U(1) symmetry, split by ten additional masses closing an SO(5) algebra that lift SO(4) and SU(2) chiral symmetries in multiple equivalent ways.

If this is right

  • Charge 4e Kekulé pair density waves can develop in the skyrmion core of Néel layer antiferromagnet.
  • A skyrmion of quantum spin Hall insulator in addition supports an s-wave pairing in its core.
  • Skyrmions of three anticommuting masses possess an SU(2) isospin quantum number besides the usual generalized U(1) charge.
  • Checkerboard or Kagome lattices supporting only a single copy of quadratic band touching exhibit a different internal algebra of competing orders in defect cores.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The color degeneracy may allow multiple distinct ordered phases to nucleate locally around defects even when only one is stable in the bulk.
  • Local density-of-states maps or transport measurements near defects could reveal signatures of several coexisting mass orders due to this degeneracy.
  • The same splitting mechanism might operate in other two-dimensional systems that host quadratic band touchings under strain or in artificial lattices.

Load-bearing premise

That a prototypical system such as Bernal bilayer graphene supports exactly eight zero-energy modes in the presence of a mass vortex with the requisite U(1) symmetry.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic measurement around a vortex in bilayer graphene that finds a number of zero modes other than eight, or finds only one copy of each chiral-triplet order rather than three distinct copies near the core.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2004.13043 by Bitan Roy.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Triangle of three mutually anticommuting masses, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Geometric representation of five SO(4) subgroups [Eq. (20) and Appendix B], resulting from the generators of SO(5) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (a)-(e): Four SU(2) subgroups (each represented by a triangles), resulting from the corresponding SO(4) subgroup [see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Two sets of three mutually anticommuting masses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study two-dimensional fermionic systems, displaying quadratic band touching in the normal state, in the presence of vortices and skyrmions of insulating and superconducting masses in the ordered phase. A prototypical example of such systems is the Bernal bilayer graphene that supports eight zero-energy modes in the presence of a mass vortex with the requisite U(1) symmetry. Near the vortex core, additional ten masses that close an SO(5) algebra can develop local expectation values by splitting the manifold of zero modes in five and ten different ways by lifting its SO(4) and SU(2) chiral symmetries, respectively. In particular, each SU(2) chiral symmetry can be broken by three distinct copies of chiral-triplet mass orders, giving rise to the notion of the color degeneracy among the competing orders near the vortex core. By contrast, a skyrmion of three anticommuting masses supports additional six masses in its core, and possesses an SU(2) isospin quantum number, besides the usual generalized U(1) charge. Consequently, charge $4e$ Kekul\'e pair density waves can develop in the skyrmion core of N\'eel layer antiferromagnet, while a skyrmion of quantum spin Hall insulator in addition supports an $s$ wave pairing. We also analyze the internal algebra of competing orders in the core of these defects on checkerboard or Kagome lattice that supports only a single copy of quadratic band touching in the normal state.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies 2D fermionic systems with quadratic band touching (prototypically Bernal bilayer graphene) in the presence of vortices and skyrmions of insulating and superconducting masses. It claims that a U(1)-symmetric mass vortex binds exactly eight zero-energy modes whose degeneracy manifold can be split by ten additional masses that close an SO(5) algebra, lifting SO(4) symmetry in five ways and each of two SU(2) chiral symmetries in three ways (chiral-triplet masses), thereby producing color degeneracy among competing orders near the core. Skyrmions of three anticommuting masses are stated to support six additional masses plus an SU(2) isospin quantum number, allowing charge-4e Kekulé PDW or s-wave pairing in the core; the analysis is repeated for single-copy QBT on checkerboard/Kagome lattices.

Significance. If the zero-mode multiplicity and algebraic closure hold, the work supplies a parameter-free symmetry classification of local mass orders that can condense near defect cores, identifying a concrete mechanism (mode splitting) for degeneracy among competing phases. The explicit counting of five + ten splitting channels and the assignment of SU(2) isospin to skyrmion cores are strengths that follow directly from the mode algebra rather than fitting or self-referential definitions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and the central claim): the statement that Bernal bilayer graphene supports exactly eight zero-energy modes for a U(1)-symmetric mass vortex is load-bearing for the subsequent SO(5) algebra, the five-way SO(4) splitting, and the three-way splitting per SU(2) that produces color degeneracy; the manuscript presents this multiplicity without an explicit index-theorem derivation, lattice diagonalization, or reference to a prior calculation that would confirm the count is protected against intervalley scattering or higher-order terms.
  2. [Abstract] The extension to skyrmion cores (six additional masses, SU(2) isospin, and consequent 4e Kekulé or s-wave orders) inherits the same zero-mode counting assumption; if the vortex multiplicity is not rigorously established, the skyrmion phenomenology does not follow.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the ten masses that close SO(5) and the three distinct chiral-triplet copies per SU(2) should be introduced with explicit matrix representations or anticommutation relations to make the algebra verifiable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recognizing the potential significance of the symmetry classification of competing orders near defect cores. We address the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and the central claim): the statement that Bernal bilayer graphene supports exactly eight zero-energy modes for a U(1)-symmetric mass vortex is load-bearing for the subsequent SO(5) algebra, the five-way SO(4) splitting, and the three-way splitting per SU(2) that produces color degeneracy; the manuscript presents this multiplicity without an explicit index-theorem derivation, lattice diagonalization, or reference to a prior calculation that would confirm the count is protected against intervalley scattering or higher-order terms.

    Authors: We agree that the eight zero-mode count is central to the subsequent algebraic analysis. The manuscript takes this multiplicity as given for Bernal bilayer graphene (a standard result for quadratic band touching with appropriate mass vortex) and focuses on the SO(5) closure and splitting channels. To strengthen the presentation, the revised manuscript will include an explicit index-theorem argument establishing the protected zero-mode multiplicity and its robustness to intervalley scattering and higher-order terms. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The extension to skyrmion cores (six additional masses, SU(2) isospin, and consequent 4e Kekulé or s-wave orders) inherits the same zero-mode counting assumption; if the vortex multiplicity is not rigorously established, the skyrmion phenomenology does not follow.

    Authors: The skyrmion results are derived from the same zero-mode algebra as the vortex case. Once the vortex multiplicity is justified explicitly (as planned in the revision), the skyrmion counting and the associated additional masses, SU(2) isospin, and 4e orders follow directly. The revised manuscript will clarify this dependence and include the supporting derivation for the base count. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on algebraic splitting of an externally stated zero-mode count.

full rationale

The manuscript takes as given that Bernal bilayer graphene supports eight zero-energy modes for a U(1)-symmetric mass vortex, then uses symmetry algebra (SO(4), SU(2) chiral symmetries) to enumerate how ten additional masses can split the manifold in five and ten ways, respectively. This produces the claimed color degeneracy. No equation equates a derived quantity to a fitted input by construction, no load-bearing premise reduces solely to a self-citation whose authors overlap with the present work, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior self-reference. The eight-mode count is presented as a property of the prototypical system rather than derived or fitted within this paper; once accepted, the subsequent SO(5) algebra and splitting patterns are independent algebraic consequences. The analysis on checkerboard/Kagome lattices is likewise symmetry-based. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks for the mode multiplicity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about the existence and degeneracy of zero modes in quadratic band touching systems; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Bernal bilayer graphene supports eight zero-energy modes for a mass vortex with U(1) symmetry
    Stated as prototypical example enabling the SO(5) algebra and color degeneracy
  • domain assumption Additional masses close an SO(5) algebra and can develop local expectation values by splitting zero-mode manifold
    Core premise allowing multiple symmetry-breaking channels

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5802 in / 1397 out tokens · 27566 ms · 2026-05-24T15:22:39.877886+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Exchange of two layers: Iuv =τ0⊗σ0⊗η0⊗α1,

    work page

  2. [2]

    exchange of two valleys: IK =τ0⊗σ0⊗η1⊗α0,

    work page

  3. [3]

    reversal of time: IT = (τ0⊗σ2⊗η1⊗α0)K,

    work page

  4. [4]

    rotation of the spin quantization axis: ⃗S =τ0⊗⃗ σ⊗ η0⊗α0,

    work page

  5. [5]

    It should be notated that the exchange of two layers and valleys are accompanied by the inversions of momentum axes ky→− ky and kx→− kx, respectively

    U(1) translational symmetry: Itr =τ3⊗σ0⊗η3⊗α0. It should be notated that the exchange of two layers and valleys are accompanied by the inversions of momentum axes ky→− ky and kx→− kx, respectively. Therefore, all mass orders can be classified according to their trans- formation under these symmetries, see Table II. Altogether Bernal BLG supports twelve diff...

    work page

  6. [6]

    (13) Then the vortex Hamiltonian, defined as H Nam vor =H Nam 0 (k→−i∇) +Mvor(x), (14) supports four zero-energy modes

    Vortex If we construct a vortex out of two mutually anticom- muting masses, say M1 and M2, according to Mvor(x) =|m(r)| [M1Cφ +M2Sφ]. (13) Then the vortex Hamiltonian, defined as H Nam vor =H Nam 0 (k→−i∇) +Mvor(x), (14) supports four zero-energy modes. Note that four mu- tually anticommuting matrices in H Nam vor close a C(4, 0) algebra. Thus the eight-di...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Skyrmion Next we proceed to construct a skyrmion out of three mutually anticommuting masses, say M1,M 2 and M3, 4 The Clifford algebra C(p, q) defines a set of p + q mutually anti- commuting matrices, where p(q) of them squares to +1(−1). 7 M4 M3 M5 M6 E34 E35 E56 E46 E45 E36 (a) M34 M3 M36 M35 EM4 EM6 E56 E45 E46 EM 5 (b) M34 M4 M46 M45 EM3 EM6 E56 E35 E36...

    work page

  8. [8]

    (13) and (14)

    Vortex First we focus on vortex constituted by two mutu- ally anticommuting mass matricesM1 andM2, following the protocol in Eqs. (13) and (14). But, now all matri- ces (Γ1, Γ2,M 1,M 2) are sixteen-dimensional. Since these four matrices satisfy C(4, 0) algebra, H Nam vor can be cast as orthogonal sum of four copies of Hvor, see Eq. (6). Consequently,H Nam...

    work page

  9. [9]

    (15)], with Γ 1, Γ2, M1,M2 andM3 as sixteen-dimensional imaginary Hermi- tian matrices

    Skyrmion Now we focus on skyrmion [see Eq. (15)], with Γ 1, Γ2, M1,M2 andM3 as sixteen-dimensional imaginary Hermi- tian matrices. In the presence of an underlying skyrmion there is no bound state at zero energy. But, the ones at finite energies still possess two-fold degeneracy, guar- anteed by the pseudo time-reversal operator JK, with U∈{M4,M 5,M 6,M 34...

    work page

  10. [10]

    However, we restrict the discussion to some physically pertinent situations

    Vortex Due to a large number of masses, one can construct a myriad of vortices out of any two mutually anticommut- ing masses shown in Table II. However, we restrict the discussion to some physically pertinent situations. (1) Vortex of spin-singlet Kekule currents ( M1 = KE,M 2 = KO): Ten masses that anticommute with K E and KO are the layer polarized (LP...

    work page

  11. [11]

    The five sets of four mutually anticommuting masses are { N1, SH3, K1 E, K1 O } , { N2, SH3, K2 E, K2 O } , { KE, KO, N1, N2} , { LP, KE, K1 O, K2 O } , { LP, KO, K1 E, K2 E }

    Inside the vor- tex core, one then finds layer polarized state (LP), easy- plane components of layer anti-ferromagnet (N1, N2) and spin-triplet Kekule currents (K1 E, K2 E, K1 O, K2 O), easy-axis QSHI (SH 3), and singlet Kekule currents (K E and K O). The five sets of four mutually anticommuting masses are { N1, SH3, K1 E, K1 O } , { N2, SH3, K2 E, K2 O } ,...

    work page

  12. [12]

    (1) N´ eel layer anti-ferromagnet, withMj = Nj forj = 1, 2, 3

    Skyrmion Now we consider skyrmion of triplet masses in BLG. (1) N´ eel layer anti-ferromagnet, withMj = Nj forj = 1, 2, 3. The six mass matrices that anticommute with H Nam skyr [see Eq. (15)] are Kekule currents (K E and K O) and spin singlet Kekule superconductors (sK 1, sK2, pK1 and pK2). The generalized U(1) charge of the skyrmion QN´ eel skyr =τ3⊗σ0⊗...

    work page

  13. [13]

    The time-reversal operator is, therefore, It =K, and I 2 t = +1, which is basis independent. Therefore, when valence and conduction band display quadratic touch- ing, the minimal representation of such a system can be two-component, and therefore the system does not nec- essarily encounter the fermion doubling . On the other hand, when d1(k) = vkx, and d2...

    work page

  14. [14]

    Senthil, A

    T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, S. Sachdev and M. P. A. Fisher, Science 303, 1490 (2004)

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Senthil, L

    T. Senthil, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 70, 144407 (2004)

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    A. W. Sandvik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 227202 (2007)

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    R. K. Kaul and A. W. Sandvik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 137201 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Nahum, P

    A. Nahum, P. Serna, J. T. Chalker, M. Ortuo, and A. M. Somoza, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 267203 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Nahum, J

    A. Nahum, J. T. Chalker, P. Serna, M. Ortuo, and A. M.Somoza, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041048(2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    A. F. Albuquerque, D. Schwandt, B. Het´ enyi, S. Cap- poni, M. Mambrini, and A. M. L¨ auchli, Phys. Rev. B 84, 024406 (2011)

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    A. G. Abanov and P. Weigman, Nucl. Phys. B 570, 685 (2000)

    work page 2000

  22. [22]

    Tanaka and X

    A. Tanaka and X. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 036402 (2005)

    work page 2005

  23. [23]

    Senthil and M

    T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 74, 064405 (2006)

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    Grover and T

    T. Grover and T. Senthil, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 156804 (2008)

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    S. Ryu, C. Mudry, C-Y. Hou, C. Chamon, Phys. Rev. B 80, 205319 (2009)

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    Seradjeh, J

    B. Seradjeh, J. E. Moore, and M. Franz, 103, 066402 (2009)

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    Ghaemi, S

    P. Ghaemi, S. Ryu and D-H. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 81, 081403(R) (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    L. Fu, S. Sachdev, C. Xu, Phys. Rev. B 83, 165123 (2011)

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    I. F. Herbut, Phys. Rev. B 85, 085304 (2012)

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    I. F. Herbut, C-K. Lu, and B. Roy, Phys. Rev. B 86, 075101 (2012)

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    Hsu, and S

    C-H. Hsu, and S. Chakravarty, Phys. Rev. B 87, 085114 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Goswami and Q

    P. Goswami and Q. Si, Phys. Rev. B 89, 045124 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    C-C. Liu, P. Goswami, and Q. Si, Phys. Rev. B 96, 125101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    I. F. Herbut, V. Juriˇ ci´ c, B. Roy, Phys. Rev. B79, 085116 (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    B. Roy, P. Goswami, and V. Juriˇ ci´ c, Phys. Rev. B97, 205117 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 14 (2009)

    work page 2009

  37. [37]

    Nandkishore and L

    R. Nandkishore and L. Levitov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104,156803 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    Nandkishore and L

    R. Nandkishore and L. Levitov, Phys. Rev. B 82, 115431 (2010)

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    Zhang, H

    F. Zhang, H. Min, M. Polini, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 81, 041402(R) (2010)

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Vafek, Phys

    O. Vafek, Phys. Rev. B 82, 205106 (2010)

    work page 2010

  41. [41]

    Lemonik, I.L

    Y. Lemonik, I.L. Aleiner, C. Toke, and V.I. Falko, Phys. Rev. B 82, 201408(R) (2010)

    work page 2010

  42. [42]

    Cvetkovic, R

    V. Cvetkovic, R. Throckmorton, and O. Vafek, Phys. Rev. B 86, 075467 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Zhang, H

    F. Zhang, H. Min, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 88, 155128 (2012)

    work page 2012

  44. [44]

    Lemonik, I

    Y. Lemonik, I. L. Aleiner, and V. I. Fal’ko, Phys. Rev. B 85, 245451 (2012)

    work page 2012

  45. [45]

    M. M. Scherer, S. Uebelacker, and C. Honerkamp, Phys. Rev. B 85, 235408 (2012)

    work page 2012

  46. [46]

    T. C. Lang, Z.-Y. Meng, M. M. Scherer, S. Uebelacker, F. F. Assaad, A. Muramatsu, C. Honerkamp, and S. Wessel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 126402 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    L. Zhu, V. Aji, and C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. B 87, 035427 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Kharitonov, Phys

    M. Kharitonov, Phys. Rev. B 86, 195435 (2012)

    work page 2012

  49. [49]

    Roy, Phys

    B. Roy, Phys. Rev. B, 89, 201401(R) (2014)

    work page 2014

  50. [50]

    M. V. Milovanovi´ c and S. Predin, Phys. Rev. B 86, 195113 (2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    R. E. Throckmorton and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 90, 205407 (2014)

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    Dong, Y-H

    Y-M. Dong, Y-H. Zhai, D-X. Zheng, J. Wang, arXiv:2003.06776

    work page arXiv 2003

  53. [53]

    Pujari, T

    S. Pujari, T. C. Lang, G. Murthy, and R. K. Kaul, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 086404 (2016)

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    S. Ray, M. Vojta, and L. Janssen, Phys. Rev. B 98, 245128 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    Hesselmann, C

    S. Hesselmann, C. Honerkamp, S. Wessel, T. C. Lang, Phys. Rev. B 101, 075128 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Freitag, J

    F. Freitag, J. Trbovic, M. Weiss, and C. Sch¨ onenberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 076602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  57. [57]

    Velasco Jr., L

    J. Velasco Jr., L. Jing, W. Bao, Y. Lee, P. Kratz, V. Aji, M. Bockrath, C.N. Lau, C. Varma, R. Stillwell, D. Smirnov, Fan Zhang, J. Jung, and A. H. MacDonald, Nat. Nano. 7, 156 (2012)

    work page 2012

  58. [58]

    Freitag, W

    F. Freitag, W. Weiss, R. Maurand, J. Trbovic, and C. Sch¨ onenberger, Phys. Rev. B87, 161402(R) (2013)

    work page 2013

  59. [59]

    Freitag, M

    F. Freitag, M. Weiss, R. Maurand, J. Trbovic, and C. Sch¨ onenberger, Solid State Commun.152, 2053 (2012)

    work page 2053

  60. [60]

    R. T. Weitz, M. T. Allen, B. E. Feldman, J. Martin, and A. Jacoby, Science 330, 812 (2010)

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    A. S. Mayorov, D. C. Elias, M. Mucha-Kruczynski, R. V. Gorbachev, T. Tudorovskiy, A. Zhukov, S. V. Morozov, M. I. Katsnelson, V. I. Fal’ko, A. K. Geim, and K. S. Novoselov, Science 333 860 (2011)

    work page 2011

  62. [62]

    Veligura, H

    A. Veligura, H. J. van Elferen, N. Tombros, J. C. Maan, U. Zeitler, and B. J. van Wees, Phys. Rev. B 85, 155412 (2012)

    work page 2012

  63. [63]

    Velasco Jr., Y

    J. Velasco Jr., Y. Lee, F. Zhang, K. Myhro, D. Tran, M. Deo, D. Smirnov, A. H. MacDonald, and C. N. Lau, Nat. Commun. 5, 4550 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    I. F. Herbut and C-K. Lu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 266402 (2012)

    work page 2012

  65. [65]

    Moon, Phys

    E-G. Moon, Phys. Rev. B 85, 245123 (2012)

    work page 2012

  66. [66]

    Lee and S

    J. Lee and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 90, 195427 (2014)

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    D. A. Abanin, S. A. Parameswaran, and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 076802 (2009)

    work page 2009

  68. [68]

    Lee and S

    J. Lee and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 226801 (2015)

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    Okubo, J

    S. Okubo, J. Math. Phys. 32, 1657 (1991); ibid. 32, 1669 (1991)

    work page 1991

  70. [70]

    Roy, Phys

    B. Roy, Phys. Rev. B 88, 075415(2013)

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    K. Sun, H. Yao, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 046811 (2009)

    work page 2009

  72. [72]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. B 37, 95 (1971)

    work page 1971

  73. [73]

    Witten, Nucl

    E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B223, 422 (1983)

    work page 1983

  74. [74]

    Jaroszewicz, Phys

    T. Jaroszewicz, Phys. Lett. B 146, 337 (1984)

    work page 1984

  75. [75]

    Y. Liu, Z. Wang, T. Sato, M. Hohenadler, C. Wang, W. Guo, F. F. Assaad, Nat. Commun. 10, 2658 (2019)

    work page 2019

  76. [76]

    Ippoliti, R

    M. Ippoliti, R. S. K. Mong, F. F. Assaad, and M. P. Zaletel, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235108 (2018)

    work page 2018

  77. [77]

    Z. Wang, M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, F. F. Assaad, arXiv:2003.08368

    work page arXiv 2003

  78. [78]

    A. L. Szab´ o, Interactions and symmetries of electronic systems with quadratic band touching , M. Sc. Thesis, Si- mon Fraser University (2016)

    work page 2016

  79. [79]

    Gotfried and T-M

    K. Gotfried and T-M. Yan, Quantum Mechanics: Fun- damentals, 2nd ed., (Springer, 2004)

    work page 2004

  80. [80]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Nucl. Phys. 185, 20 (1981)

    work page 1981

Showing first 80 references.