Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Astrophysical Insights into Radial Velocity Jitter from an Analysis of 600 Planet-search Stars

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.13734 v1 pith:TBSS52GS submitted 2020-04-28 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Astrophysical Insights into Radial Velocity Jitter from an Analysis of 600 Planet-search Stars

classification astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR
keywords jitterstarsstellaractivityradialvelocityastrophysicalconvectively-driven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Radial velocity (RV) detection of planets is hampered by astrophysical processes on the surfaces of stars that induce a stochastic signal, or "jitter", which can drown out or even mimic planetary signals. Here, we empirically and carefully measure the RV jitter of more than 600 stars from the California Planet Search (CPS) sample on a star-by-star basis. As part of this process we explore the activity-RV correlation of stellar cycles and include appendices listing every ostensibly companion-induced signal we removed and every activity cycle we noted. We then use precise stellar properties from Brewer et al. (2017) to separate the sample into bins of stellar mass and examine trends with activity and with evolutionary state. We find RV jitter tracks stellar evolution and that in general, stars evolve through different stages of RV jitter: the jitter in younger stars is driven by magnetic activity, while the jitter in older stars is convectively-driven and dominated by granulation and oscillations. We identify the "jitter minimum" -- where activity-driven and convectively-driven jitter have similar amplitudes -- for stars between 0.7 and 1.7 $M_{\odot}$ and find that more massive stars reach this jitter minimum later in their lifetime, in the subgiant or even giant phases. Finally, we comment on how these results can inform future radial velocity efforts, from prioritization of follow-up targets from transit surveys like TESS to target selection of future RV surveys.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.