REVIEW 2 cited by
WT5?! Training Text-to-Text Models to Explain their Predictions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Neural networks have recently achieved human-level performance on various challenging natural language processing (NLP) tasks, but it is notoriously difficult to understand why a neural network produced a particular prediction. In this paper, we leverage the text-to-text framework proposed by Raffel et al.(2019) to train language models to output a natural text explanation alongside their prediction. Crucially, this requires no modifications to the loss function or training and decoding procedures -- we simply train the model to output the explanation after generating the (natural text) prediction. We show that this approach not only obtains state-of-the-art results on explainability benchmarks, but also permits learning from a limited set of labeled explanations and transferring rationalization abilities across datasets. To facilitate reproducibility and future work, we release our code use to train the models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Iterative Self-Improvement of Vision Language Models for Image Scoring and Self-Explanation
An iterative self-training method using DPO on self-generated score-conditioned explanations improves both image scoring accuracy and score-explanation consistency in VLMs.
-
Towards Transparent AI: A Survey on Explainable Large Language Models
A review that groups LLM explainability methods by transformer architecture and discusses their evaluation and applications.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.