Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multi-task Ensembles with Crowdsourced Features Improve Skin Lesion Diagnosis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.14745 v2 pith:CYHD2FGQ submitted 2020-04-28 cs.HC cs.CVcs.LGeess.IV

classification cs.HCcs.CVcs.LGeess.IV
keywords featuresmodelmulti-taskbaselinecrowdsourcedensembleslesionskin
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning has a recognised need for large amounts of annotated data. Due to the high cost of expert annotations, crowdsourcing, where non-experts are asked to label or outline images, has been proposed as an alternative. Although many promising results are reported, the quality of diagnostic crowdsourced labels is still unclear. We propose to address this by instead asking the crowd about visual features of the images, which can be provided more intuitively, and by using these features in a multi-task learning framework through ensemble strategies. We compare our proposed approach to a baseline model with a set of 2000 skin lesions from the ISIC 2017 challenge dataset. The baseline model only predicts a binary label from the skin lesion image, while our multi-task model also predicts one of the following features: asymmetry of the lesion, border irregularity and color. We show that multi-task models with individual crowdsourced features have limited effect on the model, but when combined in an ensembles, leads to improved generalisation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.794 for the baseline model and 0.811 and 0.808 for multi-task ensembles respectively. Finally, we discuss the findings, identify some limitations and recommend directions for further research. The code of the models is available at https://github.com/raumannsr/hints_crowd.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Data Annotations as Pedagogical Hints: From Subjective Labels to Critical Thinking

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 43-student case study finds that manual annotation of skin lesions increased self-reported understanding of label subjectivity and AI bias, while students still tended to treat disagreement as a problem to fix.

Pith tools