Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Shared Autonomy with Learned Latent Actions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.03210 v2 pith:OTNUQLZJ submitted 2020-05-07 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords robotsharedactionsautonomygoaleatinglatentlearned
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Assistive robots enable people with disabilities to conduct everyday tasks on their own. However, these tasks can be complex, containing both coarse reaching motions and fine-grained manipulation. For example, when eating, not only does one need to move to the correct food item, but they must also precisely manipulate the food in different ways (e.g., cutting, stabbing, scooping). Shared autonomy methods make robot teleoperation safer and more precise by arbitrating user inputs with robot controls. However, these works have focused mainly on the high-level task of reaching a goal from a discrete set, while largely ignoring manipulation of objects at that goal. Meanwhile, dimensionality reduction techniques for teleoperation map useful high-dimensional robot actions into an intuitive low-dimensional controller, but it is unclear if these methods can achieve the requisite precision for tasks like eating. Our insight is that---by combining intuitive embeddings from learned latent actions with robotic assistance from shared autonomy---we can enable precise assistive manipulation. In this work, we adopt learned latent actions for shared autonomy by proposing a new model structure that changes the meaning of the human's input based on the robot's confidence of the goal. We show convergence bounds on the robot's distance to the most likely goal, and develop a training procedure to learn a controller that is able to move between goals even in the presence of shared autonomy. We evaluate our method in simulations and an eating user study. See videos of our experiments here: https://youtu.be/7BouKojzVyk

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LAMS: LLM-Driven Automatic Mode Switching for Assistive Teleoperation

    cs.RO 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-based system that predicts joystick-to-robot control mappings from natural language task context, and refines those predictions from user corrections, reduces manual mode switches in assistive teleoperation.

  2. Improving User Experience in Preference-Based Optimization of Reward Functions for Assistive Robots

    cs.RO 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Combining CMA-ES sampling with information gain query selection improved perceived behavioral adaptation and overall preference in a 14-person study, though ease-of-use gains over pure information gain were not significant.

Pith tools