pith. sign in

arxiv: 2005.04014 · v1 · submitted 2020-05-08 · 📡 eess.IV · cs.CV· cs.LG

Convolutional Sparse Support Estimator Based Covid-19 Recognition from X-ray Images

Mehmet Yamac , Mete Ahishali , Aysen Degerli , Serkan Kiranyaz , Muhammad E. H. Chowdhury , Moncef Gabbouj This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 14:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG
keywords Covid-19X-ray classificationsparse representationsupport estimationconvolutional networklimited datareal-time diagnosis
0
0 comments X

The pith

A convolutional network estimates sparse representation supports to classify Covid-19 from X-ray images with limited training data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to establish that the Convolutional Support Estimation Network supplies a direct, non-iterative mapping from an X-ray image to the support pattern of its sparse representation coefficients. This pattern supplies the decisive information for representation-based classification, so the method can reach usable accuracy even when only small numbers of Covid-19 X-ray examples are available for training. Readers would care because standard deep networks need large datasets while classical sparse-representation classifiers require slow iterative solvers; the proposed bridge aims to deliver both speed and data efficiency.

Core claim

CSEN provides a non-iterative real-time mapping from query sample to ideally sparse representation coefficient support, which is critical information for class decision in representation based techniques, enabling satisfactory performance with limited size datasets for Covid-19 recognition from X-ray images.

What carries the argument

Convolutional Support Estimation Network (CSEN), a network that learns to predict the locations of nonzero coefficients in a sparse representation of the input image.

If this is right

  • Classification proceeds in a single forward pass rather than repeated optimization steps.
  • Accuracy remains usable when the number of labeled Covid-19 X-rays is small.
  • The same network output can be plugged directly into existing representation-based decision rules.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same support-estimation step could be tested on other chest X-ray tasks such as pneumonia subtyping.
  • If the learned supports prove stable across hospitals, the method might reduce reliance on site-specific fine-tuning.
  • Combining CSEN with a small dictionary learned from public X-ray archives could be checked for further gains in speed.

Load-bearing premise

The support patterns that CSEN learns from small X-ray collections will separate Covid-19 cases from other conditions without iterative optimization.

What would settle it

A held-out test set of X-ray images in which the CSEN-based classifier assigns Covid-19 labels no better than chance or standard sparse solvers would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2005.04014 by Aysen Degerli, Mehmet Yamac, Mete Ahishali, Moncef Gabbouj, Muhammad E. H. Chowdhury, Serkan Kiranyaz.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Sample QaTa-Cov19 X-ray images: (a) X-ray images [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The proposed approach for Covid recognition from X-ray images. The proposed convolution support estimator network [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Baseline Approach I: collaborative representation based classification is fed by deep learning based extracted features [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Baseline Approach II: A 5-layer MLP layer is used over the features of CheXNet. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Samples from the benchmark QU-Chest dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The illustration of proposed dictionary design vs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The MLP configuration. the following variations and setting: kernel function {linear, radial basis function (RBF)}, box constraint (C parameter) in the range [1, 103 ] with log scale, and kernel scale (γ for the RBF kernel) in the range [10−4 , 10−2 ] with log scale. 4) k-Nearest-Neighbor (k-NN): Finally, we use a tradi￾tional approach, k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) is used with PCA dimensionality reduction. I… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: False Negatives of proposed Covid-19 recognition scheme. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Coronavirus disease (Covid-19) has been the main agenda of the whole world since it came in sight in December 2019. It has already caused thousands of causalities and infected several millions worldwide. Any technological tool that can be provided to healthcare practitioners to save time, effort, and possibly lives has crucial importance. The main tools practitioners currently use to diagnose Covid-19 are Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Computed Tomography (CT), which require significant time, resources and acknowledged experts. X-ray imaging is a common and easily accessible tool that has great potential for Covid-19 diagnosis. In this study, we propose a novel approach for Covid-19 recognition from chest X-ray images. Despite the importance of the problem, recent studies in this domain produced not so satisfactory results due to the limited datasets available for training. Recall that Deep Learning techniques can generally provide state-of-the-art performance in many classification tasks when trained properly over large datasets, such data scarcity can be a crucial obstacle when using them for Covid-19 detection. Alternative approaches such as representation-based classification (collaborative or sparse representation) might provide satisfactory performance with limited size datasets, but they generally fall short in performance or speed compared to Machine Learning methods. To address this deficiency, Convolution Support Estimation Network (CSEN) has recently been proposed as a bridge between model-based and Deep Learning approaches by providing a non-iterative real-time mapping from query sample to ideally sparse representation coefficient' support, which is critical information for class decision in representation based techniques.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a Convolutional Sparse Support Estimator Network (CSEN) for Covid-19 recognition from chest X-ray images. It frames CSEN as a non-iterative, real-time bridge between representation-based classification and deep learning by learning a direct mapping from a query image to the support (locations of non-zeros) of an ideally sparse representation coefficient vector, which the authors claim supplies critical information for the subsequent class decision and thereby yields satisfactory performance even with limited training data.

Significance. If the central performance claim were substantiated, the work would offer a practical, fast alternative to both iterative sparse solvers and data-hungry deep networks for an urgent medical imaging task. The hybrid model-based / learned approach could be of interest to the broader community working on representation learning under data scarcity.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the support of the sparse coefficients is 'critical information for class decision in representation based techniques' is not justified. Standard SRC decides class via per-class reconstruction residuals ||y - D_i x_i||_2 or coefficient magnitudes; replacing these with a binary support mask discards amplitude information that encodes atom contributions. No derivation, theorem, or ablation is supplied to show that the support alone preserves the necessary discriminative power on X-ray intensity patterns.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim of 'satisfactory performance with limited size datasets' is advanced without any quantitative metrics, dataset cardinalities, error bars, ablation studies, or baseline comparisons. The central empirical claim therefore cannot be evaluated from the provided text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. We address the two major comments point-by-point below, proposing revisions to the abstract where the concerns are valid.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the support of the sparse coefficients is 'critical information for class decision in representation based techniques' is not justified. Standard SRC decides class via per-class reconstruction residuals ||y - D_i x_i||_2 or coefficient magnitudes; replacing these with a binary support mask discards amplitude information that encodes atom contributions. No derivation, theorem, or ablation is supplied to show that the support alone preserves the necessary discriminative power on X-ray intensity patterns.

    Authors: We acknowledge that classical SRC classification relies on per-class residuals rather than the support mask alone. The manuscript motivates the support as carrying class-discriminative information when the dictionary atoms are class-structured, because the locations of non-zeros indicate which class-specific atoms are activated. Nevertheless, the abstract statement is stated without sufficient qualification. In the revised version we will rephrase the relevant sentence to clarify the distinction from residual-based decisions and will add a short parenthetical reference to the dictionary construction and the role of support in the method section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim of 'satisfactory performance with limited size datasets' is advanced without any quantitative metrics, dataset cardinalities, error bars, ablation studies, or baseline comparisons. The central empirical claim therefore cannot be evaluated from the provided text.

    Authors: The full manuscript reports experiments on publicly available X-ray datasets with explicit cardinalities, accuracy/F1 scores, comparisons against SRC, CNN baselines, and ablation studies on training-set size. Because the abstract is space-limited, these numbers were omitted. We will add one concise sentence to the abstract that states the key performance figures (e.g., accuracy on the smallest training split) together with the dataset sizes used, thereby making the empirical claim evaluable from the abstract itself. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents CSEN as a recently proposed bridge method that maps inputs to sparse coefficient support for classification, then applies it to limited Covid-19 X-ray data. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-definitional reductions are exhibited that would make any claimed performance or 'critical information' equivalent to the inputs by construction. The central positioning of support as discriminative is an empirical claim rather than a tautological renaming or self-citation chain that forces the result. The derivation is self-contained as an application of an external paradigm to a new domain, with no load-bearing self-citation or ansatz smuggling that collapses the argument.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the approach implicitly assumes that sparse support estimation remains informative for classification even after non-iterative approximation on small medical datasets.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5842 in / 1073 out tokens · 17922 ms · 2026-05-24T14:20:41.895750+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Advance Warning Methodologies for COVID-19 using Chest X-Ray Images

    eess.IV 2020-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Introduces the Early-QaTa-COV19 dataset and reports that CSEN reaches over 97% sensitivity and over 95.5% specificity for early COVID-19 detection from X-rays.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Challenges in control of covid-19: short doubling time and long delay to effect of interventions,

    L. Pellis, F. Scarabel, H. B. Stage, C. E. Overton, L. H. Chappell, K. A. Lythgoe, E. Fearon, E. Bennett, J. Curran-Sebastian, R. Das et al., “Challenges in control of covid-19: short doubling time and long delay to effect of interventions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.00117 , 2020

    work page arXiv 2004

  2. [2]

    Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with covid-19 in wuhan, china: a retrospective cohort study,

    F. Zhou, T. Yu, R. Du, G. Fan, Y . Liu, Z. Liu, J. Xiang, Y . Wang, B. Song, X. Gu et al., “Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with covid-19 in wuhan, china: a retrospective cohort study,” The Lancet, 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Sensitivity of chest ct for covid-19: comparison to rt-pcr,

    Y . Fang, H. Zhang, J. Xie, M. Lin, L. Ying, P. Pang, and W. Ji, “Sensitivity of chest ct for covid-19: comparison to rt-pcr,” Radiology, p. 200432, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Advanced but ex- pensive technology. balancing affordability with access in rural areas

    K. A. Erickson, K. Mackenzie, and A. Marshall, “Advanced but ex- pensive technology. balancing affordability with access in rural areas.” Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien , vol. 39, pp. 28–30, 1993

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) in suspected human cases: interim guidance, 2 march 2020,

    W. H. Organization et al. , “Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) in suspected human cases: interim guidance, 2 march 2020,” World Health Organization, Tech. Rep., 2020

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Can AI help in screening Viral and COVID-19 pneumonia?

    M. E. Chowdhury, T. Rahman, A. Khandakar, R. Mazhar, M. A. Kadir, Z. B. Mahbub, K. R. Islam, M. S. Khan, A. Iqbal, N. Al-Emadi et al., “Can ai help in screening viral and covid-19 pneumonia?” arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.13145, 2020

    work page arXiv 2003

  7. [7]

    Covid-19: automatic de- tection from x-ray images utilizing transfer learning with convolutional neural networks,

    I. D. Apostolopoulos and T. A. Mpesiana, “Covid-19: automatic de- tection from x-ray images utilizing transfer learning with convolutional neural networks,” Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine , p. 1, 2020

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Finding COVID-19 from chest X-rays using deep learning on a small dataset,

    L. O. Hall, R. Paul, D. B. Goldgof, and G. M. Goldgof, “Finding covid- 19 from chest x-rays using deep learning on a small dataset,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.02060, 2020

    work page arXiv 2004

  9. [9]

    Information-theoretic bounds on sparsity recovery in the high-dimensional and noisy setting,

    M. Wainwright, “Information-theoretic bounds on sparsity recovery in the high-dimensional and noisy setting,” in 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory . IEEE, 2007, pp. 961–965

    work page 2007

  10. [10]

    Covid-19 image data collection,

    J. P. Cohen, P. Morrison, and L. Dao, “Covid-19 image data collection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.11597 , 2020

    work page arXiv 2003

  11. [11]

    Covid-19 database,

    “Covid-19 database,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.sirm.org/ category/senza-categoria/covid-19/

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Sparse representation or collaborative representation: Which helps face recognition?

    L. Zhang, M. Yang, and X. Feng, “Sparse representation or collaborative representation: Which helps face recognition?” in 2011 International conference on computer vision . IEEE, 2011, pp. 471–478

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Robust face recognition via sparse representation,

    J. Wright, A. Y . Yang, A. Ganesh, S. S. Sastry, and Y . Ma, “Robust face recognition via sparse representation,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 210–227, 2008

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    Sparse representation for computer vision and pattern recognition,

    J. Wright, Y . Ma, J. Mairal, G. Sapiro, T. S. Huang, and S. Yan, “Sparse representation for computer vision and pattern recognition,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 1031–1044, 2010

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Convolutional Sparse Support Estimator Network (CSEN) From energy efficient support estimation to learning-aided Compressive Sensing

    M. Yamac, M. Ahishali, S. Kiranyaz, and M. Gabbouj, “Convolutional sparse support estimator network (csen) from energy efficient sup- port estimation to learning-aided compressive sensing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.00768, 2020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  16. [16]

    CheXNet: Radiologist-Level Pneumonia Detection on Chest X-Rays with Deep Learning

    P. Rajpurkar, J. Irvin, K. Zhu, B. Yang, H. Mehta, T. Duan, D. Ding, A. Bagul, C. Langlotz, K. Shpanskaya et al. , “Chexnet: Radiologist- level pneumonia detection on chest x-rays with deep learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05225, 2017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Densely connected convolutional networks,

    G. Huang, Z. Liu, L. Van Der Maaten, and K. Q. Weinberger, “Densely connected convolutional networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE confer- ence on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2017, pp. 4700–4708

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    M ´emoire sur la propagation de la chaleur dans les corps solides,

    O. D. Escoda, L. Granai, and P. Vandergheynst, “M ´emoire sur la propagation de la chaleur dans les corps solides,” Nouveau Bulletin des Sciences de la Soci ´et´e Philomathique de Paris 6 , pp. 112–116, 1808

    work page

  19. [19]

    Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries,

    S. G. Mallat and Z. Zhang, “Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries,” IEEE Transactions on signal processing , vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 3397–3415, 1993

    work page 1993

  20. [20]

    The curvelet transform for image denoising,

    J.-L. Starck, E. J. Cand `es, and D. L. Donoho, “The curvelet transform for image denoising,” IEEE Transactions on image processing , vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 670–684, 2002

    work page 2002

  21. [21]

    Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification

    J. Yang, K. Yu, Y . Gong, T. S. Huang et al. , “Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification.” in CVPR, vol. 1, no. 2, 2009, p. 6

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Sparse coding with anomaly detection,

    A. Adler, M. Elad, Y . Hel-Or, and E. Rivlin, “Sparse coding with anomaly detection,” Journal of Signal Processing Systems, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 179–188, 2015

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Detecting anomalous structures by convolutional sparse models,

    D. Carrera, G. Boracchi, A. Foi, and B. Wohlberg, “Detecting anomalous structures by convolutional sparse models,” in 2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–8

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Learning structured sparsity in deep neural networks,

    W. Wen, C. Wu, Y . Wang, Y . Chen, and H. Li, “Learning structured sparsity in deep neural networks,” in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2016, pp. 2074–2082

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Compressed sensing,

    D. L. Donoho et al. , “Compressed sensing,” IEEE Transactions on information theory, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1289–1306, 2006

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    Compressive sampling,

    E. J. Cand `es et al. , “Compressive sampling,” in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, vol. 3, 2006, pp. 1433–1452

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ell1 minimization,

    D. L. Donoho and M. Elad, “Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ell1 minimization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 2197–2202, 2003

    work page 2003

  28. [28]

    The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing,

    E. J. Candes, “The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing,” Comptes rendus mathematique, vol. 346, no. 9-10, pp. 589–592, 2008. 10

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit,

    S. S. Chen, D. L. Donoho, and M. A. Saunders, “Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit,” SIAM review, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 129–159, 2001

    work page 2001

  30. [30]

    Information- theoretic limits on sparse support recovery: Dense versus sparse mea- surements,

    W. Wang, M. J. Wainwright, and K. Ramchandran, “Information- theoretic limits on sparse support recovery: Dense versus sparse mea- surements,” in 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory. IEEE, 2008, pp. 2197–2201

    work page 2008

  31. [31]

    Robust support recovery using sparse compressive sensing matrices,

    J. Haupt and R. Baraniuk, “Robust support recovery using sparse compressive sensing matrices,” in 2011 45th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems . IEEE, 2011, pp. 1–6

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,

    J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei, “Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . Ieee, 2009, pp. 248–255

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    Chestx-ray8: Hospital-scale chest x-ray database and benchmarks on weakly-supervised classification and localization of common thorax diseases,

    X. Wang, Y . Peng, L. Lu, Z. Lu, M. Bagheri, and R. M. Summers, “Chestx-ray8: Hospital-scale chest x-ray database and benchmarks on weakly-supervised classification and localization of common thorax diseases,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2017, pp. 2097–2106

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Joint sparse representation for robust multimodal biometrics recognition,

    S. Shekhar, V . M. Patel, N. M. Nasrabadi, and R. Chellappa, “Joint sparse representation for robust multimodal biometrics recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 113–126, 2013

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    Robust visual tracking and vehicle classification via sparse representation,

    X. Mei and H. Ling, “Robust visual tracking and vehicle classification via sparse representation,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2259–2272, 2011

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    Learning sparse representations for human action recognition,

    T. Guha and R. K. Ward, “Learning sparse representations for human action recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1576–1588, 2011

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    A survey on representation-based classification and detection in hyperspectral remote sensing imagery,

    W. Li and Q. Du, “A survey on representation-based classification and detection in hyperspectral remote sensing imagery,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 83, pp. 115–123, 2016

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    [Online]

    2020. [Online]. Available: https://radiopaedia.org/playlists/25975?lang= us

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    [Online]

    2020. [Online]. Available: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/ 1243928581983670272.html

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Chest x-ray images (pneumonia),

    P. Mooney, “Chest x-ray images (pneumonia),” kaggle, Marzo ,

    work page

  41. [41]

    Available: https://www.kaggle.com/paultimothymooney/ chest-xray-pneumonia

    [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/paultimothymooney/ chest-xray-pneumonia

    work page

  42. [42]

    Nearly sharp sufficient conditions on exact sparsity pattern recovery,

    K. R. Rad, “Nearly sharp sufficient conditions on exact sparsity pattern recovery,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 4672–4679, 2011

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Limits on support recovery with probabilistic models: An information-theoretic framework,

    J. Scarlett and V . Cevher, “Limits on support recovery with probabilistic models: An information-theoretic framework,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 593–620, 2016

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Sampling bounds for sparse support recov- ery in the presence of noise,

    G. Reeves and M. Gastpar, “Sampling bounds for sparse support recov- ery in the presence of noise,” in 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory . IEEE, 2008, pp. 2187–2191

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    Approximate sparsity pattern recovery: Information-theoretic lower bounds,

    G. Reeves and M. C. Gastpar, “Approximate sparsity pattern recovery: Information-theoretic lower bounds,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 3451–3465, 2013

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Com- pressively sensed image recognition,

    A. De ˘gerli, S. Aslan, M. Yamac, B. Sankur, and M. Gabbouj, “Com- pressively sensed image recognition,” in 2018 7th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–6

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Direct inference on compressive measurements using convolutional neural networks,

    S. Lohit, K. Kulkarni, and P. Turaga, “Direct inference on compressive measurements using convolutional neural networks,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) , Sep. 2016, pp. 1913–1917

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 , 2014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [49]

    TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems

    M. Abadi, A. Agarwal, P. Barham, E. Brevdo, Z. Chen, C. Citro, G. S. Corrado, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin et al. , “Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04467, 2016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Recon- net: Non-iterative reconstruction of images from compressively sensed measurements,

    K. Kulkarni, S. Lohit, P. Turaga, R. Kerviche, and A. Ashok, “Recon- net: Non-iterative reconstruction of images from compressively sensed measurements,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2016, pp. 449–458

    work page 2016