Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

How Context Affects Language Models' Factual Predictions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.04611 v1 pith:ZQYMUGCO submitted 2020-05-10 cs.CL

How Context Affects Language Models' Factual Predictions

classification cs.CL
keywords languagepre-trainedcontextfactualinformationmodelmodelssystem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

When pre-trained on large unsupervised textual corpora, language models are able to store and retrieve factual knowledge to some extent, making it possible to use them directly for zero-shot cloze-style question answering. However, storing factual knowledge in a fixed number of weights of a language model clearly has limitations. Previous approaches have successfully provided access to information outside the model weights using supervised architectures that combine an information retrieval system with a machine reading component. In this paper, we go a step further and integrate information from a retrieval system with a pre-trained language model in a purely unsupervised way. We report that augmenting pre-trained language models in this way dramatically improves performance and that the resulting system, despite being unsupervised, is competitive with a supervised machine reading baseline. Furthermore, processing query and context with different segment tokens allows BERT to utilize its Next Sentence Prediction pre-trained classifier to determine whether the context is relevant or not, substantially improving BERT's zero-shot cloze-style question-answering performance and making its predictions robust to noisy contexts.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLMs need metacognition to align expressed uncertainty with their actual knowledge boundaries, moving beyond knowledge expansion to reduce confident errors.

  2. Cite Pretrain: Retrieval-Free Knowledge Attribution for Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    Active Indexing with synthetic data augmentation for bidirectional fact-source binding during pretraining yields up to 30.2% higher citation precision than passive identifier appending on CitePretrainBench for Qwen models.

  3. Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Models

    cs.CL 2022-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Atlas reaches over 42% accuracy on Natural Questions with only 64 examples, outperforming a 540B-parameter model by 3% with 50x fewer parameters.

  4. Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning

    cs.IR 2021-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Contrastive learning trains unsupervised dense retrievers that beat BM25 on most BEIR datasets and support cross-lingual retrieval across scripts.