REVIEW 3 cited by
Near Instance-Optimality in Differential Privacy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We develop two notions of instance optimality in differential privacy, inspired by classical statistical theory: one by defining a local minimax risk and the other by considering unbiased mechanisms and analogizing the Cramer-Rao bound, and we show that the local modulus of continuity of the estimand of interest completely determines these quantities. We also develop a complementary collection mechanisms, which we term the inverse sensitivity mechanisms, which are instance optimal (or nearly instance optimal) for a large class of estimands. Moreover, these mechanisms uniformly outperform the smooth sensitivity framework on each instance for several function classes of interest, including real-valued continuous functions. We carefully present two instantiations of the mechanisms for median and robust regression estimation with corresponding experiments.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Pure-DP Statistical Query Release at the Conjectured Square-Root Rate
Under pure differential privacy, k statistical queries over a universe of size T can be answered with expected worst-coordinate error O(min{1, sqrt(log(2T)log(2k)/(εn))}), matching known lower bounds.
-
Lightweight Protocols for Distributed Private Quantile Estimation
Adaptive local privacy can estimate any quantile over a domain of size B with O(log B/(epsilon^2 alpha^2)) users, which is optimal and a log B factor better than nonadaptive protocols.
-
PRECISE: PRivacy-loss-Efficient and Consistent Inference based on poSterior quantilEs
PRECISE is a proposed DP posterior-quantile interval method whose central privacy guarantee rests on an incorrect sensitivity bound.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.