Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Computationally efficient sparse clustering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.10817 v3 pith:TAQ7IUDS submitted 2020-05-21 math.ST cs.CCcs.LGstat.MLstat.TH

classification math.STcs.CCcs.LGstat.MLstat.TH
keywords clusteringsparsethetaresultssamplealgorithmanalysisbounds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We study statistical and computational limits of clustering when the means of the centres are sparse and their dimension is possibly much larger than the sample size. Our theoretical analysis focuses on the model $X_i = z_i \theta + \varepsilon_i, ~z_i \in \{-1,1\}, ~\varepsilon_i \thicksim \mathcal{N}(0,I)$, which has two clusters with centres $\theta$ and $-\theta$. We provide a finite sample analysis of a new sparse clustering algorithm based on sparse PCA and show that it achieves the minimax optimal misclustering rate in the regime $\|\theta\| \rightarrow \infty$. Our results require the sparsity to grow slower than the square root of the sample size. Using a recent framework for computational lower bounds -- the low-degree likelihood ratio -- we give evidence that this condition is necessary for any polynomial-time clustering algorithm to succeed below the BBP threshold. This complements existing evidence based on reductions and statistical query lower bounds. Compared to these existing results, we cover a wider set of parameter regimes and give a more precise understanding of the runtime required and the misclustering error achievable. Our results imply that a large class of tests based on low-degree polynomials fail to solve even the weak testing task.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Quasi-Polynomial Low-Degree Conjecture is False

    cs.CC 2025-05 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The paper constructs counterexamples showing that a vanishing low-degree advantage does not imply noise-tolerant computational hardness.

Pith tools