REVIEW 1 cited by
Review of Mathematical frameworks for Fairness in Machine Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Review of Mathematical frameworks for Fairness in Machine Learning
read the original abstract
A review of the main fairness definitions and fair learning methodologies proposed in the literature over the last years is presented from a mathematical point of view. Following our independence-based approach, we consider how to build fair algorithms and the consequences on the degradation of their performance compared to the possibly unfair case. This corresponds to the price for fairness given by the criteria $\textit{statistical parity}$ or $\textit{equality of odds}$. Novel results giving the expressions of the optimal fair classifier and the optimal fair predictor (under a linear regression gaussian model) in the sense of $\textit{equality of odds}$ are presented.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
FairBED: A Bayesian Experimental Design Approach to Gathering Fairer Data
FairBED quantifies dataset fairness as uninformative about sensitive attributes and uses fairness-aware BED to gather data yielding better fairness-accuracy trade-offs than random or standard BED acquisition.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.