Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Biometric Quality: Review and Application to Face Recognition with FaceQnet

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.03298 v3 pith:WUQCSUA2 submitted 2020-06-05 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords qualitybiometricfacerecognitionfaceqnetmetricsworkaccurate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

"The output of a computerised system can only be as accurate as the information entered into it." This rather trivial statement is the basis behind one of the driving concepts in biometric recognition: biometric quality. Quality is nowadays widely regarded as the number one factor responsible for the good or bad performance of automated biometric systems. It refers to the ability of a biometric sample to be used for recognition purposes and produce consistent, accurate, and reliable results. Such a subjective term is objectively estimated by the so-called biometric quality metrics. These algorithms play nowadays a pivotal role in the correct functioning of systems, providing feedback to the users and working as invaluable audit tools. In spite of their unanimously accepted relevance, some of the most used and deployed biometric characteristics are lacking behind in the development of these methods. This is the case of face recognition. After a gentle introduction to the general topic of biometric quality and a review of past efforts in face quality metrics, in the present work, we address the need for better face quality metrics by developing FaceQnet. FaceQnet is a novel open-source face quality assessment tool, inspired and powered by deep learning technology, which assigns a scalar quality measure to facial images, as prediction of their recognition accuracy. Two versions of FaceQnet have been thoroughly evaluated both in this work and also independently by NIST, showing the soundness of the approach and its competitiveness with respect to current state-of-the-art metrics. Even though our work is presented here particularly in the framework of face biometrics, the proposed methodology for building a fully automated quality metric can be very useful and easily adapted to other artificial intelligence tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Flexible Approach to Augmenting a Bayesian VAR with Nonlinear Factors

    econ.EM 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Bayesian VAR augmented with regression-tree nonlinear factors is proposed for parsimonious, scalable nonlinear macro forecasting and structural analysis; only the abstract could be reviewed because the full text sup...

  2. MSPT: A Lightweight Face Image Quality Assessment Method with Multi-stage Progressive Training

    cs.MM 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A lightweight face quality assessment model trained with progressive data diversity and resolution scaling achieves second place on the VQualA 2025 benchmark.

  3. A Lightweight Face Quality Assessment Framework to Improve Face Verification Performance in Real-Time Screening Applications

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Using five normalized facial landmarks and a Random Forest classifier, the paper reports 96.67% accuracy for assessing CCTV face quality and claims filtering low-quality faces cuts ArcFace false rejection rate from 13...

Pith tools