Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ORCAS: 18 Million Clicked Query-Document Pairs for Analyzing Search

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.05324 v2 pith:UW53YJZZ submitted 2020-06-09 cs.IR cs.LG

ORCAS: 18 Million Clicked Query-Document Pairs for Analyzing Search

classification cs.IR cs.LG
keywords clickmillionqueriestrecconnectionsdatainformationcorpus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Users of Web search engines reveal their information needs through queries and clicks, making click logs a useful asset for information retrieval. However, click logs have not been publicly released for academic use, because they can be too revealing of personally or commercially sensitive information. This paper describes a click data release related to the TREC Deep Learning Track document corpus. After aggregation and filtering, including a k-anonymity requirement, we find 1.4 million of the TREC DL URLs have 18 million connections to 10 million distinct queries. Our dataset of these queries and connections to TREC documents is of similar size to proprietary datasets used in previous papers on query mining and ranking. We perform some preliminary experiments using the click data to augment the TREC DL training data, offering by comparison: 28x more queries, with 49x more connections to 4.4x more URLs in the corpus. We present a description of the dataset's generation process, characteristics, use in ranking and suggest other potential uses.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Generative AI Disrupts Search: An Empirical Study of Google Search, Gemini, and AI Overviews

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    AI Overviews and Gemini retrieve substantially different sources than traditional Google search (Jaccard similarity <0.2), favor Google-owned content, appear for 51.5% of queries especially controversial ones, and are...

  2. DocQAC: Adaptive Trie-Guided Decoding for Effective In-Document Query Auto-Completion

    cs.IR 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    Adaptive trie-guided decoding with document context and tunable penalties improves in-document query auto-completion, outperforming baselines and larger models like LLaMA-3 on seen queries.