Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Task-similarity Aware Meta-learning through Nonparametric Kernel Regression

Machine Learning · Submitted 12 Jun 2020

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This supports our hypothesis that task-similarity helps improve the metalearning performance in task-limited and adverse settings.

how it is stated · asserted 0.69 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2006.07212 (version 2)
Pith ID7ZXIABSD, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAnders Hansson, Arun Venkitaraman, Bo Wahlberg. "Task-similarity Aware Meta-learning through Nonparametric Kernel Regression." arXiv:2006.07212 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/7ZXIABSD
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,249 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.13 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.76 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

This paper investigates the use of nonparametric kernel-regression to obtain a tasksimilarity aware meta-learning algorithm. Our hypothesis is that the use of tasksimilarity helps meta-learning when the available tasks are limited and may contain outlier/ dissimilar tasks. While existing meta-learning approaches implicitly assume the tasks as being similar, it is generally unclear how this task-similarity could be quantified and used in the learning. As a result, most popular metalearning approaches do not actively use the similarity/dissimilarity between the tasks, but rely on availability of huge number of tasks for their working. Our contribution is a novel framework for meta-learning that explicitly uses task-similarity in the form of kernels and an associated meta-learning algorithm. We model the task-specific parameters to belong to a reproducing kernel Hilbert space where the kernel function captures the similarity across tasks. The proposed algorithm iteratively learns a meta-parameter which is used to assign a task-specific descriptor for every task. The task descriptors are then used to quantify the task-similarity through the kernel function. We show how our approach conceptually generalizes the popular meta-learning approaches of model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) and Meta-stochastic gradient descent (Meta-SGD) approaches. Numerical experiments with regression tasks show that our algorithm outperforms these approaches when the number of tasks is limited, even in the presence of outlier or dissimilar tasks. This supports our hypothesis that task-similarity helps improve the metalearning performance in task-limited and adverse settings.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 This paper investigates the use of nonparametric kernel-regression to obtain a tasksimilarity aware meta-learning algorithm. contribution 0.93 0.77 0.05 asserted 0.82
s1 Our hypothesis is that the use of tasksimilarity helps meta-learning when the available tasks are limited and may contain outlier/ dissimilar tasks. background 0.69 0.13 0.12 hedged possibility 0.79
s2 While existing meta-learning approaches implicitly assume the tasks as being similar, it is generally unclear how this task-similarity could be quantified and used in the learning. gap 0.97 0.05 0.03 asserted 0.69
s3 As a result, most popular metalearning approaches do not actively use the similarity/dissimilarity between the tasks, but rely on availability of huge number of tasks for their working. background 0.50 0.06 0.03 asserted 0.98
s4 Our contribution is a novel framework for meta-learning that explicitly uses task-similarity in the form of kernels and an associated meta-learning algorithm. contribution 1.00 0.92 0.10 asserted 1.00
s5 We model the task-specific parameters to belong to a reproducing kernel Hilbert space where the kernel function captures the similarity across tasks. method 0.97 0.83 0.04 asserted 1.00
s6 The proposed algorithm iteratively learns a meta-parameter which is used to assign a task-specific descriptor for every task. method 0.99 0.87 0.04 asserted 1.00
s7 The task descriptors are then used to quantify the task-similarity through the kernel function. method 1.00 0.82 0.05 asserted 1.00
s8 We show how our approach conceptually generalizes the popular meta-learning approaches of model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) and Meta-stochastic gradient descent (Meta-SGD) approaches. contribution 0.86 0.84 0.04 asserted 1.00
s9 Numerical experiments with regression tasks show that our algorithm outperforms these approaches when the number of tasks is limited, even in the presence of outlier or dissimilar tasks. result 1.00 0.96 0.65 asserted 1.00
s10 This supports our hypothesis that task-similarity helps improve the metalearning performance in task-limited and adverse settings. interpretation 1.00 0.79 0.64 asserted 0.69

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.67.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

This paper investigates the use of nonparametric kernel-regression to obtain a tasksimilarity aware meta-learning algorithm. Our hypothesis is that the use of tasksimilarity helps meta-learning when the available tasks are limited and may contain outlier/ dissimilar tasks. While existing meta-learning approaches implicitly assume the tasks as being similar, it is generally unclear how this task-similarity could be quantified and used in the learning. As a result, most popular metalearning approaches do not actively use the similarity/dissimilarity between the tasks, but rely on availability of huge number of tasks for their working. Our contribution is a novel framework for meta-learning that explicitly uses task-similarity in the form of kernels and an associated meta-learning algorithm. We model the task-specific parameters to belong to a reproducing kernel Hilbert space where the kernel function captures the similarity across tasks. The proposed algorithm iteratively learns a meta-parameter which is used to assign a task-specific descriptor for every task. The task descriptors are then used to quantify the task-similarity through the kernel function. We show how our approach conceptually generalizes the popular meta-learning approaches of model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) and Meta-stochastic gradient descent (Meta-SGD) approaches. Numerical experiments with regression tasks show that our algorithm outperforms these approaches when the number of tasks is limited, even in the presence of outlier or dissimilar tasks. This supports our hypothesis that task-similarity helps improve the metalearning performance in task-limited and adverse settings.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.