REVIEW 2 cited by
AVLnet: Learning Audio-Visual Language Representations from Instructional Videos
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Current methods for learning visually grounded language from videos often rely on text annotation, such as human generated captions or machine generated automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcripts. In this work, we introduce the Audio-Video Language Network (AVLnet), a self-supervised network that learns a shared audio-visual embedding space directly from raw video inputs. To circumvent the need for text annotation, we learn audio-visual representations from randomly segmented video clips and their raw audio waveforms. We train AVLnet on HowTo100M, a large corpus of publicly available instructional videos, and evaluate on image retrieval and video retrieval tasks, achieving state-of-the-art performance. We perform analysis of AVLnet's learned representations, showing our model utilizes speech and natural sounds to learn audio-visual concepts. Further, we propose a tri-modal model that jointly processes raw audio, video, and text captions from videos to learn a multi-modal semantic embedding space useful for text-video retrieval. Our code, data, and trained models will be released at avlnet.csail.mit.edu
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Let Your Video Listen to Your Music!
MVAA aligns a video's motion peaks to music beats via keyframe re-timing and diffusion-based inpainting, aiming to preserve the original content while improving rhythmic synchronization.
-
A Survey of Recent Advances and Challenges in Deep Audio-Visual Correlation Learning
A review that categorizes deep audio-visual correlation learning methods by architectures, objective functions, datasets, and evaluation metrics, and points to missing standardized benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.