Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Predicting the phase stability of multi-component high entropy compounds

Materials Science · Submitted 19 Jun 2020

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This approach allows for the evaluation of potential secondary phases, thereby making realistic predictions of novel multi-component compounds that can be synthesized.

how it is stated · asserted 0.84 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2006.11231 (version 2)
Pith IDKFXDEOIO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCraig A. Bridges, Krishna Chaitanya Pitike, Markus Eisenbach, Santosh KC, Valentino R. Cooper. "Predicting the phase stability of multi-component high entropy compounds." arXiv:2006.11231 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/KFXDEOIO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,541 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.10 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.32 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.67 · compares with prior results 0.82 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A generic method to estimate the relative feasibility of formation of high entropy compounds in a single phase, directly from first principles, is developed. As a first step, the relative formation abilities of 56 multi-component, AO, oxides were evaluated. These were constructed from 5 cation combinations chosen from A={Ca, Co, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni, Zn}. Candidates for multi-component oxides are predicted from descriptors related to the enthalpy and configurational entropy obtained from the mixing enthalpies of two component oxides. The utility of this approach is evaluated by comparing the predicted combinations with the experimentally realized entropy stabilized oxide, (MgCoCuNiZn)O. In the second step, Monte Carlo simulations are utilized to investigate the phase composition and local ionic segregation as a function of temperature. This approach allows for the evaluation of potential secondary phases, thereby making realistic predictions of novel multi-component compounds that can be synthesized.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A generic method to estimate the relative feasibility of formation of high entropy compounds in a single phase, directly from first principles, is developed. contribution 0.99 0.95 0.21 asserted 1.00
s1 As a first step, the relative formation abilities of 56 multi-component, AO, oxides were evaluated. method 0.64 0.93 0.04 asserted 0.99
s2 These were constructed from 5 cation combinations chosen from A={Ca, Co, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni, Zn}. method 0.96 0.79 0.02 asserted 0.98
s3 Candidates for multi-component oxides are predicted from descriptors related to the enthalpy and configurational entropy obtained from the mixing enthalpies of two component oxides. method 0.98 0.85 0.11 asserted 1.00
s4 The utility of this approach is evaluated by comparing the predicted combinations with the experimentally realized entropy stabilized oxide, (MgCoCuNiZn)O. method 0.66 0.86 0.14 asserted 0.99
s5 In the second step, Monte Carlo simulations are utilized to investigate the phase composition and local ionic segregation as a function of temperature. method 0.99 0.90 0.04 asserted 0.99
s6 This approach allows for the evaluation of potential secondary phases, thereby making realistic predictions of novel multi-component compounds that can be synthesized. interpretation 0.82 0.71 0.32 asserted 0.84

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A generic method to estimate the relative feasibility of formation of high entropy compounds in a single phase, directly from first principles, is developed. As a first step, the relative formation abilities of 56 multi-component, AO, oxides were evaluated. These were constructed from 5 cation combinations chosen from A={Ca, Co, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni, Zn}. Candidates for multi-component oxides are predicted from descriptors related to the enthalpy and configurational entropy obtained from the mixing enthalpies of two component oxides. The utility of this approach is evaluated by comparing the predicted combinations with the experimentally realized entropy stabilized oxide, (MgCoCuNiZn)O. In the second step, Monte Carlo simulations are utilized to investigate the phase composition and local ionic segregation as a function of temperature. This approach allows for the evaluation of potential secondary phases, thereby making realistic predictions of novel multi-component compounds that can be synthesized.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.