Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Modeling the Field Emission Enhancement Factor for Capped Carbon Nanotubes using the Induced Electron Density

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics · Submitted 19 Jun 2020

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim It is found that apex values of local induced FEF are similar for the two SWCNTs, are independent of $F_{\rm{M}}$, and are similar to FEF-values found from classical conductor models.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2006.11344 (version 1)
Pith ID6EU5CGOO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCaio M. C. de Castilho, Caio P. de Castro, Fernando de B. Mota, Richard G. Forbes, Roberto Rivelino, Thiago A. de Assis. "Modeling the Field Emission Enhancement Factor for Capped Carbon Nanotubes using the Induced Electron Density." arXiv:2006.11344 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/6EU5CGOO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 9,182 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.28 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.16 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.88 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In many field electron emission experiments on single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), the SWCNT stands on one of two well-separated parallel plane plates, with a macroscopic field FM applied between them. For any given location "L" on the SWCNT surface, a field enhancement factor (FEF) is defined as $F_{\rm{L}}$/$F_{\rm{M}}$, where $F_{\rm{L}}$ is a local field defined at "L". The best emission measurements from small-radii capped SWCNTs exhibit characteristic FEFs that are constant (i.e., independent of $F_{\rm{M}}$). This paper discusses how to retrieve this result in quantum-mechanical (as opposed to classical electrostatic) calculations. Density functional theory (DFT) is used to analyze the properties of two short, floating SWCNTS, capped at both ends, namely a (6,6) and a (10,0) structure. Both have effectively the same height ($\sim 5.46$ nm) and radius ($\sim 0.42$ nm). It is found that apex values of local induced FEF are similar for the two SWCNTs, are independent of $F_{\rm{M}}$, and are similar to FEF-values found from classical conductor models. It is suggested that these induced-FEF values relate to the SWCNT longitudinal system polarizabilities, which are presumed similar. The DFT calculations also generate "real", as opposed to ``induced", potential-energy (PE) barriers for the two SWCNTs, for FM-values from 3 V/$\mu$m to 2 V/nm. PE profiles along the SWCNT axis and along a parallel ``observation line" through one of the topmost atoms are similar. At low macroscopic fields the details of barrier shape differ for the two SWCNT types. Even for $F_{\rm{M}}=0$, there are distinct PE structures present at the emitter apex (different for the two SWCNTs); this suggests the presence of structure-specific chemically induced charge transfers and related patch-field distributions.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In many field electron emission experiments on single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), the SWCNT stands on one of two well-separated parallel plane plates, with a macroscopic field FM applied between them. background 1.00 0.11 0.02 asserted 0.99
s1 For any given location "L" on the SWCNT surface, a field enhancement factor (FEF) is defined as $F_{\rm{L}}$/$F_{\rm{M}}$, where $F_{\rm{L}}$ is a local field defined at "L". background 0.99 0.11 0.02 asserted 0.98
s2 The best emission measurements from small-radii capped SWCNTs exhibit characteristic FEFs that are constant (i.e., independent of $F_{\rm{M}}$). background 0.92 0.10 0.11 asserted 1.00
s3 This paper discusses how to retrieve this result in quantum-mechanical (as opposed to classical electrostatic) calculations. contribution 0.72 0.36 0.06 unclear 0.55
s4 Density functional theory (DFT) is used to analyze the properties of two short, floating SWCNTS, capped at both ends, namely a (6,6) and a (10,0) structure. method 0.65 0.93 0.04 asserted 0.98
s5 Both have effectively the same height ($\sim 5.46$ nm) and radius ($\sim 0.42$ nm). method 0.77 0.64 0.02 asserted 0.99
s6 It is found that apex values of local induced FEF are similar for the two SWCNTs, are independent of $F_{\rm{M}}$, and are similar to FEF-values found from classical conductor models. result 1.00 0.95 0.56 asserted 1.00
s7 It is suggested that these induced-FEF values relate to the SWCNT longitudinal system polarizabilities, which are presumed similar. interpretation 1.00 0.51 0.22 hedged possibility 0.97
s8 The DFT calculations also generate "real", as opposed to ``induced", potential-energy (PE) barriers for the two SWCNTs, for FM-values from 3 V/$\mu$m to 2 V/nm. result 0.65 0.95 0.07 asserted 1.00
s9 PE profiles along the SWCNT axis and along a parallel ``observation line" through one of the topmost atoms are similar. result 1.00 0.92 0.05 asserted 1.00
s10 At low macroscopic fields the details of barrier shape differ for the two SWCNT types. result 1.00 0.89 0.04 asserted 1.00
s11 Even for $F_{\rm{M}}=0$, there are distinct PE structures present at the emitter apex (different for the two SWCNTs); this suggests the presence of structure-specific chemically induced charge transfers and related patch-field distributions. interpretation 0.81 0.87 0.09 hedged possibility 0.96

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.99 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In many field electron emission experiments on single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), the SWCNT stands on one of two well-separated parallel plane plates, with a macroscopic field FM applied between them. For any given location "L" on the SWCNT surface, a field enhancement factor (FEF) is defined as $F_{\rm{L}}$/$F_{\rm{M}}$, where $F_{\rm{L}}$ is a local field defined at "L". The best emission measurements from small-radii capped SWCNTs exhibit characteristic FEFs that are constant (i.e., independent of $F_{\rm{M}}$). This paper discusses how to retrieve this result in quantum-mechanical (as opposed to classical electrostatic) calculations. Density functional theory (DFT) is used to analyze the properties of two short, floating SWCNTS, capped at both ends, namely a (6,6) and a (10,0) structure. Both have effectively the same height ($\sim 5.46$ nm) and radius ($\sim 0.42$ nm). It is found that apex values of local induced FEF are similar for the two SWCNTs, are independent of $F_{\rm{M}}$, and are similar to FEF-values found from classical conductor models. It is suggested that these induced-FEF values relate to the SWCNT longitudinal system polarizabilities, which are presumed similar. The DFT calculations also generate "real", as opposed to ``induced", potential-energy (PE) barriers for the two SWCNTs, for FM-values from 3 V/$\mu$m to 2 V/nm. PE profiles along the SWCNT axis and along a parallel ``observation line" through one of the topmost atoms are similar. At low macroscopic fields the details of barrier shape differ for the two SWCNT types. Even for $F_{\rm{M}}=0$, there are distinct PE structures present at the emitter apex (different for the two SWCNTs); this suggests the presence of structure-specific chemically induced charge transfers and related patch-field distributions.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.