Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.16923 v2 pith:AKFAPELQ submitted 2020-06-24 cs.CY stat.APstat.ML

Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?

classification cs.CY stat.APstat.ML
keywords datasetcensusdatasetslargevisioncomputercurationimage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper we investigate problematic practices and consequences of large scale vision datasets. We examine broad issues such as the question of consent and justice as well as specific concerns such as the inclusion of verifiably pornographic images in datasets. Taking the ImageNet-ILSVRC-2012 dataset as an example, we perform a cross-sectional model-based quantitative census covering factors such as age, gender, NSFW content scoring, class-wise accuracy, human-cardinality-analysis, and the semanticity of the image class information in order to statistically investigate the extent and subtleties of ethical transgressions. We then use the census to help hand-curate a look-up-table of images in the ImageNet-ILSVRC-2012 dataset that fall into the categories of verifiably pornographic: shot in a non-consensual setting (up-skirt), beach voyeuristic, and exposed private parts. We survey the landscape of harm and threats both society broadly and individuals face due to uncritical and ill-considered dataset curation practices. We then propose possible courses of correction and critique the pros and cons of these. We have duly open-sourced all of the code and the census meta-datasets generated in this endeavor for the computer vision community to build on. By unveiling the severity of the threats, our hope is to motivate the constitution of mandatory Institutional Review Boards (IRB) for large scale dataset curation processes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling

    cs.CL 2020-12 conditional novelty 8.0

    The Pile is a newly constructed 825 GiB dataset from 22 diverse sources that enables language models to achieve better performance on academic, professional, and cross-domain tasks than models trained on Common Crawl ...

  2. Toward Calibrated, Fair, and accurate Deepfake Detection

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Face-Feature Tuning is a label-free logit remapping method that reduces FPR/TPR gaps across groups in deepfake detection while preserving overall accuracy.

  3. How to Stop Playing Whack-a-Mole: Mapping the Ecosystem of Technologies Facilitating AI-Generated Non-Consensual Intimate Images

    cs.CY 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The paper introduces the first comprehensive taxonomy and visualization of 11 categories of technologies facilitating AI-generated non-consensual intimate images, derived from synthesis of primary sources and demonstr...

  4. Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding

    cs.CV 2022-05 accept novelty 7.0

    Imagen achieves state-of-the-art photorealistic text-to-image generation by scaling a text-only pretrained T5 language model within a diffusion framework, reaching FID 7.27 on COCO without training on it.

  5. Multilingual Training and Evaluation Resources for Vision-Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Releases regenerated multilingual training data and translated benchmarks for VLMs in five languages and demonstrates consistent benefits from multilingual training over English-only baselines.

  6. Multilingual Training and Evaluation Resources for Vision-Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-04 conditional novelty 4.0

    A multilingual VLM training corpus and evaluation benchmark suite for five European languages shows consistent cross-lingual transfer gains without English degradation.