Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Machine Learning Explainability for External Stakeholders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.05408 v1 pith:LYOS7F2O submitted 2020-07-10 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords learningmachineexplainablestudiesaroundbeencasedeploying
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As machine learning is increasingly deployed in high-stakes contexts affecting people's livelihoods, there have been growing calls to open the black box and to make machine learning algorithms more explainable. Providing useful explanations requires careful consideration of the needs of stakeholders, including end-users, regulators, and domain experts. Despite this need, little work has been done to facilitate inter-stakeholder conversation around explainable machine learning. To help address this gap, we conducted a closed-door, day-long workshop between academics, industry experts, legal scholars, and policymakers to develop a shared language around explainability and to understand the current shortcomings of and potential solutions for deploying explainable machine learning in service of transparency goals. We also asked participants to share case studies in deploying explainable machine learning at scale. In this paper, we provide a short summary of various case studies of explainable machine learning, lessons from those studies, and discuss open challenges.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 40 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Your Model Is Unfair, Are You Even Aware? Inverse Relationship Between Comprehension and Trust in Explainability Visualizations of Biased ML Models

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    More comprehensible explainability visualizations increase perceived model bias and decrease trust, with bias perception mediating the negative comprehension-trust relationship.

  2. Scalable Explainability-as-a-Service (XaaS) for Edge AI Systems

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    XaaS decouples explanation generation from model inference via a distributed cache, verification protocol, and adaptive engine, achieving 38% lower latency in three edge-AI use cases.

  3. Importance of User Control in Data-Centric Steering for Healthcare Experts

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Healthcare experts who manually adjusted training data improved a diabetes prediction model more than those using automated corrections, without losing trust or understanding.

Pith tools