Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Data from Model: Extracting Data from Non-robust and Robust Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.06196 v1 pith:S4IXL6G3 submitted 2020-07-13 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords datamodeldifferentmodelsrobustaccuracydeepdrop
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The essence of deep learning is to exploit data to train a deep neural network (DNN) model. This work explores the reverse process of generating data from a model, attempting to reveal the relationship between the data and the model. We repeat the process of Data to Model (DtM) and Data from Model (DfM) in sequence and explore the loss of feature mapping information by measuring the accuracy drop on the original validation dataset. We perform this experiment for both a non-robust and robust origin model. Our results show that the accuracy drop is limited even after multiple sequences of DtM and DfM, especially for robust models. The success of this cycling transformation can be attributed to the shared feature mapping existing in data and model. Using the same data, we observe that different DtM processes result in models having different features, especially for different network architecture families, even though they achieve comparable performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools