Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Special Relativity -- Applications to astronomy and the accelerator physics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.07780 v14 pith:UHU4CVC7 submitted 2020-07-14 physics.class-ph astro-ph.IMphysics.acc-ph

classification physics.class-phastro-ph.IMphysics.acc-ph
keywords bookrelativitytheorywhatshouldspecialarbitraryconvention
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

There are many books on the classical subject of special relativity. However, after having spent a number of years, both in relativistic engineering and research with relativity, I have come to the conclusion that there exist a place for a new book. I do believe that the present book is not quite the same as the others, mainly due to attempt to cast light on dark corners. I should make it clear what this little book is not. It is not a textbook on relativity theory. What the book is about is the nature of special relativistic kinematics, its relation to space and time, and the operational interpretation of coordinate transformations. Every theory contains a number of quantities that can be measured by experiment and an expressions that cannot possibly be observed. Whenever we have a theory containing an arbitrary convention, we should examine what parts of the theory depend on the choice of that convention and what parts do not. The distinction is not always made and many authors claim some data to be observable, according to arbitrary conventions, which do not correspond to any physical experiment. This leads to inconsistencies and paradoxes that should be avoided at all cost.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools