Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Mono vs Multilingual Transformer-based Models: a Comparison across Several Language Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.09757 v1 pith:XAZ3YXRX submitted 2020-07-19 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords languagemodelsbertmultilingualtaskstextualalbertdetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) and ALBERT (A Lite BERT) are methods for pre-training language models which can later be fine-tuned for a variety of Natural Language Understanding tasks. These methods have been applied to a number of such tasks (mostly in English), achieving results that outperform the state-of-the-art. In this paper, our contribution is twofold. First, we make available our trained BERT and Albert model for Portuguese. Second, we compare our monolingual and the standard multilingual models using experiments in semantic textual similarity, recognizing textual entailment, textual category classification, sentiment analysis, offensive comment detection, and fake news detection, to assess the effectiveness of the generated language representations. The results suggest that both monolingual and multilingual models are able to achieve state-of-the-art and the advantage of training a single language model, if any, is small.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Implicit Causality-biases in humans and LLMs as a tool for benchmarking LLM discourse capabilities

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Most tested LLMs fail to reproduce human implicit causality biases in coreference, coherence, and referring-expression form, even when they show partial coreference effects.

Pith tools