Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Persistent Friedel oscillations in Graphene due to a weak magnetic field

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics · Submitted 27 Jul 2020

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Here we show that a weak uniform magnetic field affects the Friedel oscillations in an anomalous way.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2007.13726 (version 2)
Pith IDAKF3YFMO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationKe Wang, M. E. Raikh, T. A. Sedrakyan. "Persistent Friedel oscillations in Graphene due to a weak magnetic field." arXiv:2007.13726 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/AKF3YFMO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,669 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.28 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.86 · compares with prior results 0.90 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Two opposite chiralities of Dirac electrons in a 2D graphene sheet modify the Friedel oscillations strongly: electrostatic potential around an impurity in graphene decays much faster than in 2D electron gas. At distances $r$ much larger than the de Broglie wavelength, it decays as $1/r^3$. Here we show that a weak uniform magnetic field affects the Friedel oscillations in an anomalous way. It creates a field-dependent contribution which is {\em dominant} in a parametrically large spatial interval $p_0^{-1}\lesssim r\lesssim k_Fl^2$, where $l$ is the magnetic length, $k_F$ is Fermi momentum and $p_0^{-1}=(k_Fl)^{4/3}/k_F$. Moreover, in this interval, the field-dependent oscillations do not decay with distance. The effect originates from a spin-dependent magnetic phase accumulated by the electron propagator. The obtained phase may give rise to novel interaction effects in transport and thermodynamic characteristics of graphene and graphene-based heterostructures.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Two opposite chiralities of Dirac electrons in a 2D graphene sheet modify the Friedel oscillations strongly: electrostatic potential around an impurity in graphene decays much faster than in 2D electron gas. background 0.92 0.24 0.07 asserted 1.00
s1 At distances $r$ much larger than the de Broglie wavelength, it decays as $1/r^3$. background 0.78 0.42 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 Here we show that a weak uniform magnetic field affects the Friedel oscillations in an anomalous way. contribution 0.75 0.83 0.25 asserted 1.00
s3 It creates a field-dependent contribution which is {\em dominant} in a parametrically large spatial interval $p_0^{-1}\lesssim r\lesssim k_Fl^2$, where $l$ is the magnetic length, $k_F$ is Fermi momentum and $p_0^{-1}=(k_Fl)^{4/3}/k_F$. result 0.98 0.91 0.62 asserted 1.00
s4 Moreover, in this interval, the field-dependent oscillations do not decay with distance. result 1.00 0.91 0.40 asserted 1.00
s5 The effect originates from a spin-dependent magnetic phase accumulated by the electron propagator. interpretation 0.92 0.77 0.06 asserted 1.00
s6 The obtained phase may give rise to novel interaction effects in transport and thermodynamic characteristics of graphene and graphene-based heterostructures. interpretation 0.99 0.43 0.10 hedged possibility 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Two opposite chiralities of Dirac electrons in a 2D graphene sheet modify the Friedel oscillations strongly: electrostatic potential around an impurity in graphene decays much faster than in 2D electron gas. At distances $r$ much larger than the de Broglie wavelength, it decays as $1/r^3$. Here we show that a weak uniform magnetic field affects the Friedel oscillations in an anomalous way. It creates a field-dependent contribution which is {\em dominant} in a parametrically large spatial interval $p_0^{-1}\lesssim r\lesssim k_Fl^2$, where $l$ is the magnetic length, $k_F$ is Fermi momentum and $p_0^{-1}=(k_Fl)^{4/3}/k_F$. Moreover, in this interval, the field-dependent oscillations do not decay with distance. The effect originates from a spin-dependent magnetic phase accumulated by the electron propagator. The obtained phase may give rise to novel interaction effects in transport and thermodynamic characteristics of graphene and graphene-based heterostructures.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.