Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Bilevel Continual Learning

Machine Learning · Submitted 30 Jul 2020

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our extensive experiments on continual learning benchmarks demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed BCL compared to many state-of-the-art methods.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2007.15553 (version 1)
Pith IDVQOK2SL4, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationChenghao Liu, Doyen Sahoo, Quang Pham, Steven C.H Hoi. "Bilevel Continual Learning." arXiv:2007.15553 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/VQOK2SL4
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,407 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.58 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.98.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Continual learning aims to learn continuously from a stream of tasks and data in an online-learning fashion, being capable of exploiting what was learned previously to improve current and future tasks while still being able to perform well on the previous tasks. One common limitation of many existing continual learning methods is that they often train a model directly on all available training data without validation due to the nature of continual learning, thus suffering poor generalization at test time. In this work, we present a novel framework of continual learning named "Bilevel Continual Learning" (BCL) by unifying a {\it bilevel optimization} objective and a {\it dual memory management} strategy comprising both episodic memory and generalization memory to achieve effective knowledge transfer to future tasks and alleviate catastrophic forgetting on old tasks simultaneously. Our extensive experiments on continual learning benchmarks demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed BCL compared to many state-of-the-art methods. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/phquang/bilevel-continual-learning.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Continual learning aims to learn continuously from a stream of tasks and data in an online-learning fashion, being capable of exploiting what was learned previously to improve current and future tasks while still being able to perform well on the previous tasks. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 0.99
s1 One common limitation of many existing continual learning methods is that they often train a model directly on all available training data without validation due to the nature of continual learning, thus suffering poor generalization at test time. background 0.60 0.06 0.03 asserted 0.92
s2 In this work, we present a novel framework of continual learning named "Bilevel Continual Learning" (BCL) by unifying a {\it bilevel optimization} objective and a {\it dual memory management} strategy comprising both episodic memory and generalization memory to achieve effective knowledge transfer to future tasks and alleviate catastrophic forgetting on old tasks simultaneously. contribution 0.84 0.88 0.21 asserted 1.00
s3 Our extensive experiments on continual learning benchmarks demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed BCL compared to many state-of-the-art methods. result 1.00 0.96 0.72 asserted 1.00
s4 Our implementation is available at https://github.com/phquang/bilevel-continual-learning. contribution 0.70 0.48 0.02 asserted 0.97

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Continual learning aims to learn continuously from a stream of tasks and data in an online-learning fashion, being capable of exploiting what was learned previously to improve current and future tasks while still being able to perform well on the previous tasks. One common limitation of many existing continual learning methods is that they often train a model directly on all available training data without validation due to the nature of continual learning, thus suffering poor generalization at test time. In this work, we present a novel framework of continual learning named "Bilevel Continual Learning" (BCL) by unifying a {\it bilevel optimization} objective and a {\it dual memory management} strategy comprising both episodic memory and generalization memory to achieve effective knowledge transfer to future tasks and alleviate catastrophic forgetting on old tasks simultaneously. Our extensive experiments on continual learning benchmarks demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed BCL compared to many state-of-the-art methods. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/phquang/bilevel-continual-learning.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 12 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 8 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 2 papers
Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 4 sentences without a confident label

Contests 1 paper
  • Despite the initial success of existing works [ref] , there is still a huge performance gap because they struggle to balance between knowledge transfer and preventing catastrophic forgetting.

    On Tiny Episodic Memories in Continual Learning · Introduction · contest 0.77

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
  • To alleviate the computational cost, we use the first-order approximation proposed in [ref] .

    On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithms · First-Order Approximation · 1.00

  • This can be achieved by employing a knowledge distillation regularizer [ref] on the inner objective as follows: [equation] where $τ$ denotes the softmax's temperature, which is usually set to be greater than 1.

    Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network · Preventing The Inner Optimization Bias · 1.00

Compares with 1 paper
  • Particularly, we consider the following continual learning methods: LwF [ref] , EWC [ref] , ICARL [ref] , GEM [ref] , KDR [ref] , ER [ref] , MER [ref] , FTML [ref] .

    On Tiny Episodic Memories in Continual Learning · Benchmarks and Baselines · 0.97

Cites as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.