Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scans

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.06388 v4 pith:KQHQ4WRS submitted 2020-08-14 cs.LG cs.CVeess.IVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CVeess.IVstat.ML
keywords covid-19machinemodelslearningreviewchestclinicalidentified
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning methods offer great promise for fast and accurate detection and prognostication of COVID-19 from standard-of-care chest radiographs (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) images. Many articles have been published in 2020 describing new machine learning-based models for both of these tasks, but it is unclear which are of potential clinical utility. In this systematic review, we search EMBASE via OVID, MEDLINE via PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv and arXiv for published papers and preprints uploaded from January 1, 2020 to October 3, 2020 which describe new machine learning models for the diagnosis or prognosis of COVID-19 from CXR or CT images. Our search identified 2,212 studies, of which 415 were included after initial screening and, after quality screening, 61 studies were included in this systematic review. Our review finds that none of the models identified are of potential clinical use due to methodological flaws and/or underlying biases. This is a major weakness, given the urgency with which validated COVID-19 models are needed. To address this, we give many recommendations which, if followed, will solve these issues and lead to higher quality model development and well documented manuscripts.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Advance Warning Methodologies for COVID-19 using Chest X-Ray Images

    eess.IV 2020-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Introduces the Early-QaTa-COV19 dataset and reports that CSEN reaches over 97% sensitivity and over 95.5% specificity for early COVID-19 detection from X-rays.

Pith tools