Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On the Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning with Policy Space Generalization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.07353 v1 pith:K2YO4UTW submitted 2020-08-17 cs.LG cs.AIcs.DSstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.DSstat.ML
keywords spacepolicycomplexitysamplegeneralizationlearningactionbound
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the optimal sample complexity in large-scale Reinforcement Learning (RL) problems with policy space generalization, i.e. the agent has a prior knowledge that the optimal policy lies in a known policy space. Existing results show that without a generalization model, the sample complexity of an RL algorithm will inevitably depend on the cardinalities of state space and action space, which are intractably large in many practical problems. To avoid such undesirable dependence on the state and action space sizes, this paper proposes a new notion of eluder dimension for the policy space, which characterizes the intrinsic complexity of policy learning in an arbitrary Markov Decision Process (MDP). Using a simulator oracle, we prove a near-optimal sample complexity upper bound that only depends linearly on the eluder dimension. We further prove a similar regret bound in deterministic systems without the simulator.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Space Complexity of Learning-Unlearning Algorithms

    cs.LG 2025-06 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    The space complexity of machine unlearning for realizability testing is characterized by eluder dimension (central lower bound), star number (ticketed upper bound), and hollow star number (bounded deletions), separati...

  2. Semi-pessimistic Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Semi-pessimistic pseudo labeling learns a pessimistic reward lower bound from labeled plus unlabeled data and uses it to train offline RL policies, with regret bounds under a weaker semi-coverage condition.

Pith tools