REVIEW 2 cited by
On the Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning with Policy Space Generalization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study the optimal sample complexity in large-scale Reinforcement Learning (RL) problems with policy space generalization, i.e. the agent has a prior knowledge that the optimal policy lies in a known policy space. Existing results show that without a generalization model, the sample complexity of an RL algorithm will inevitably depend on the cardinalities of state space and action space, which are intractably large in many practical problems. To avoid such undesirable dependence on the state and action space sizes, this paper proposes a new notion of eluder dimension for the policy space, which characterizes the intrinsic complexity of policy learning in an arbitrary Markov Decision Process (MDP). Using a simulator oracle, we prove a near-optimal sample complexity upper bound that only depends linearly on the eluder dimension. We further prove a similar regret bound in deterministic systems without the simulator.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Space Complexity of Learning-Unlearning Algorithms
The space complexity of machine unlearning for realizability testing is characterized by eluder dimension (central lower bound), star number (ticketed upper bound), and hollow star number (bounded deletions), separati...
-
Semi-pessimistic Reinforcement Learning
Semi-pessimistic pseudo labeling learns a pessimistic reward lower bound from labeled plus unlabeled data and uses it to train offline RL policies, with regret bounds under a weaker semi-coverage condition.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.