Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Correspondence between dissipative phase transitions of light and time crystals

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.08075 v1 pith:72BPNTUB submitted 2020-08-18 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords dissipativetimecrystalphaseemergenceframelightliouvillian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We predict the emergence of a time crystal generated by an incoherently driven and dissipative nonlinear optical oscillator, where the nonlinearity also comes from dissipation. We show that a second-order dissipative phase transition of light occurs in the frame rotating at the cavity frequency, while a boundary (dissipative) time crystal emerges in the laboratory frame. We relate these two phenomena by using the Liouvillian superoperator associated with the Lindblad master equation and its symmetries. These results connect the emergence of a second-order dissipative phase transition and a dissipative time crystal in the thermodynamic limit, allowing to interpret them as the same phenomenon in terms of the Liouvillian spectrum, but just in different frames.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. UniqueNESS: Graph Theory Approach to the Uniqueness of Non-Equilibrium Stationary States of the Lindblad Master Equation

    quant-ph 2025-04 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper claims graph strong connectivity can certify a unique steady state of the Lindblad equation, but the supporting lemma is false in general.

Pith tools