REVIEW 3 cited by
A Taxonomy of Knowledge Gaps for Wikimedia Projects (Second Draft)
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In January 2019, prompted by the Wikimedia Movement's 2030 strategic direction, the Research team at the Wikimedia Foundation identified the need to develop a knowledge gaps index -- a composite index to support the decision makers across the Wikimedia movement by providing: a framework to encourage structured and targeted brainstorming discussions; data on the state of the knowledge gaps across the Wikimedia projects that can inform decision making and assist with measuring the long term impact of large scale initiatives in the Movement. After its first release in July 2020, the Research team has developed the second complete draft of a taxonomy of knowledge gaps for the Wikimedia projects, as the first step towards building the knowledge gap index. We studied more than 250 references by scholars, researchers, practitioners, community members and affiliates -- exposing evidence of knowledge gaps in readership, contributorship, and content of Wikimedia projects. We elaborated the findings and compiled the taxonomy of knowledge gaps in this paper, where we describe, group and classify knowledge gaps into a structured framework. The taxonomy that you will learn more about in the rest of this work will serve as a basis to operationalize and quantify knowledge equity, one of the two 2030 strategic directions, through the knowledge gaps index.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Participatory AI: A Scandinavian Approach to Human-Centered AI
Participatory AI applies five Scandinavian Participatory Design principles to four AI design challenges, illustrated through five diverse case studies.
-
Filling in the Blanks? A Systematic Review and Theoretical Conceptualisation for Measuring WikiData Content Gaps
A systematic review of 45 studies on Wikidata content gaps yields a gap typology and a nine-dimension framework for measuring missing or biased knowledge.
-
On the effective transfer of knowledge from English to Hindi Wikipedia
A retrieval, neutralization, and machine-translation pipeline can add relevant factual text to Hindi Wikipedia biography sections, but the claimed 65% and 62% gains are not fully supported by the reported evaluation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.