Pith. sign in

REVIEW

HL-LHC Computing Review: Common Tools and Community Software

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.13636 v1 pith:S4QO5W76 submitted 2020-08-31 physics.comp-ph hep-ex

HL-LHC Computing Review: Common Tools and Community Software

HEP Software Foundation: Thea Aarrestad , Simone Amoroso , Markus Julian Atkinson , Joshua Bendavid , Tommaso Boccali , Andrea Bocci , Andy Buckley , Matteo Cacciari
show 100 more authors
Paolo Calafiura Philippe Canal Federico Carminati Taylor Childers Vitaliano Ciulli Gloria Corti Davide Costanzo Justin Gage Dezoort Caterina Doglioni Javier Mauricio Duarte Agnieszka Dziurda Peter Elmer Markus Elsing V. Daniel Elvira Giulio Eulisse Javier Fernandez Menendez Conor Fitzpatrick Rikkert Frederix Stefano Frixione Krzysztof L Genser Andrei Gheata Francesco Giuli Vladimir V. Gligorov Hadrien Benjamin Grasland Heather Gray Lindsey Gray Alexander Grohsjean Christian G\"utschow Stephan Hageboeck Philip Coleman Harris Benedikt Hegner Lukas Heinrich Burt Holzman Walter Hopkins Shih-Chieh Hsu Stefan H\"oche Philip James Ilten Vladimir Ivantchenko Chris Jones Michel Jouvin Teng Jian Khoo Ivan Kisel Kyle Knoepfel Dmitri Konstantinov Attila Krasznahorkay Frank Krauss Benjamin Edward Krikler David Lange Paul Laycock Qiang Li Kilian Lieret Miaoyuan Liu Vladimir Loncar Leif L\"onnblad Fabio Maltoni Michelangelo Mangano Zachary Louis Marshall Pere Mato Olivier Mattelaer Joshua Angus McFayden Samuel Meehan Alaettin Serhan Mete Ben Morgan Stephen Mrenna Servesh Muralidharan Ben Nachman Mark S. Neubauer Tobias Neumann Jennifer Ngadiuba Isobel Ojalvo Kevin Pedro Maurizio Perini Danilo Piparo Jim Pivarski Simon Pl\"atzer Witold Pokorski Adrian Alan Pol Stefan Prestel Alberto Ribon Martin Ritter Andrea Rizzi Eduardo Rodrigues Stefan Roiser Holger Schulz Markus Schulz Marek Sch\"onherr Elizabeth Sexton-Kennedy Frank Siegert Andrzej Si\'odmok Graeme A Stewart Malik Sudhir Sioni Paris Summers Savannah Jennifer Thais Nhan Viet Tran Andrea Valassi Marc Verderi Dorothea Vom Bruch Gordon T. Watts Torre Wenaus Efe Yazgan
This is my paper
classification physics.comp-ph hep-ex
keywords softwarecommoncommunityatlaschallengesexperimentfuturehl-lhc
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Common and community software packages, such as ROOT, Geant4 and event generators have been a key part of the LHC's success so far and continued development and optimisation will be critical in the future. The challenges are driven by an ambitious physics programme, notably the LHC accelerator upgrade to high-luminosity, HL-LHC, and the corresponding detector upgrades of ATLAS and CMS. In this document we address the issues for software that is used in multiple experiments (usually even more widely than ATLAS and CMS) and maintained by teams of developers who are either not linked to a particular experiment or who contribute to common software within the context of their experiment activity. We also give space to general considerations for future software and projects that tackle upcoming challenges, no matter who writes it, which is an area where community convergence on best practice is extremely useful.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.