Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Unscrambling the omelette of causation and inference: The framework of causal-inferential theories

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.03297 v3 pith:7CLQYLYT submitted 2020-09-07 quant-ph

Unscrambling the omelette of causation and inference: The framework of causal-inferential theories

classification quant-ph
keywords theoryrealistoperationalcausal-inferentialnoncontextualitynotionquantumaccount
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Using a process-theoretic formalism, we introduce the notion of a causal-inferential theory: a triple consisting of a theory of causal influences, a theory of inferences (of both the Boolean and Bayesian varieties), and a specification of how these interact. Recasting the notions of operational and realist theories in this mold clarifies what a realist account of an experiment offers beyond an operational account. It also yields a novel characterization of the assumptions and implications of standard no-go theorems for realist representations of operational quantum theory, namely, those based on Bell's notion of locality and those based on generalized noncontextuality. Moreover, our process-theoretic characterization of generalised noncontextuality is shown to be implied by an even more natural principle which we term Leibnizianity. Most strikingly, our framework offers a way forward in a research program that seeks to circumvent these no-go results. Specifically, we argue that if one can identify axioms for a realist causal-inferential theory such that the notions of causation and inference can differ from their conventional (classical) interpretations, then one has the means of defining an intrinsically quantum notion of realism, and thereby a realist representation of operational quantum theory that salvages the spirit of locality and of noncontextuality.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Decoupling local classicality from classical explainability: A noncontextual model for bilocal classical theory and a locally-classical but contextual theory

    quant-ph 2025-11 accept novelty 7.0

    Bilocal classical theory has a classical ontological model, but some locally-classical latent theories do not, so local classicality and classical explainability are logically independent.

  2. Typicality of Contextuality

    quant-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Random qubit prepare-and-measure experiments are contextual with probability near 1 once they contain enough preparations and measurements, yet the typical strength of contextuality — and the resulting quantum advanta...

  3. Contextuality in anomalous heat flow

    quant-ph 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Anomalous heat flow occurs in quantum prepare-transform-measure protocols only when noncontextuality inequalities are violated, for evolution times in (0, τ_c), with analysis of an existing experiment and extension to...

  4. What Do Black Holes Teach Us About Wigner's Friend?

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Black hole paradoxes favor Wigner's Friend responses that posit intrinsic relationality and retrocausality.