REVIEW 2 cited by
Revisiting Graph Convolutional Network on Semi-Supervised Node Classification from an Optimization Perspective
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Graph convolutional networks (GCNs) have achieved promising performance on various graph-based tasks. However they suffer from over-smoothing when stacking more layers. In this paper, we present a quantitative study on this observation and develop novel insights towards the deeper GCN. First, we interpret the current graph convolutional operations from an optimization perspective and argue that over-smoothing is mainly caused by the naive first-order approximation of the solution to the optimization problem. Subsequently, we introduce two metrics to measure the over-smoothing on node-level tasks. Specifically, we calculate the fraction of the pairwise distance between connected and disconnected nodes to the overall distance respectively. Based on our theoretical and empirical analysis, we establish a universal theoretical framework of GCN from an optimization perspective and derive a novel convolutional kernel named GCN+ which has lower parameter amount while relieving the over-smoothing inherently. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the superior performance of GCN+ over state-of-the-art baseline methods on the node classification tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Exploring and Improving Initialization for Deep Graph Neural Networks: A Signal Propagation Perspective
SPoGInit stabilizes forward, backward, and embedding-variation signal propagation in deep graph convolutional networks, mitigating the performance degradation that normally comes with depth.
-
Aggregate-then-Calibrate for Human-centered Assessment with Theoretical Guarantees
Aggregate-then-Calibrate projects model scores onto a human-derived consensus ranking, claiming theoretical guarantees over model-only assessment; the central proofs have important gaps.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.